Poland vs Puerto Rico: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Poland
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Poland currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Poland ahead.
Poland ranks 106th and Puerto Rico ranks 106th of 219 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0018 kt | 0.0006 kt | 0.0012 kt | Poland |
| 2000s | 0.004 kt | 0 kt | 0.004 kt | Poland |
| 2010s | 0.001 kt | 0 kt | 0.001 kt | Poland |
| 2020s | 0.0021 kt | 0 kt | 0.0021 kt | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Poland or Puerto Rico?
- Poland, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Poland and Puerto Rico?
- 0 kt, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Puerto Rico?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Poland and Puerto Rico rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Poland ranks 106th and Puerto Rico ranks 106th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf