Cayman Islands vs Poland: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Cayman Islands
- Poland
How they compare
Cayman Islands currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Poland, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Cayman Islands ranks 132nd and Poland ranks 132nd of 254 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cayman Islands | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0.0018 kt | 0.0018 kt | Poland |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.004 kt | 0.004 kt | Poland |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.001 kt | 0.001 kt | Poland |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0.0021 kt | 0.0021 kt | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Cayman Islands or Poland?
- Cayman Islands, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Poland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Cayman Islands and Poland?
- 0 kt, with Cayman Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cayman Islands and Poland?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Cayman Islands and Poland rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Cayman Islands ranks 132nd and Poland ranks 132nd of 254 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf