Armenia vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Armenia
1.05 kt
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR
0.6938 kt
in 2023
Armenia rank
40th
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
41st

Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Armenia
  • China, Hong Kong SAR
01234196119922023

How they compare

Armenia currently reports 1.05 kt against 0.6938 kt in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 0.3562 kt.

That makes Armenia's figure about 1.5 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Armenia has been ahead every year.

Armenia ranks 40th and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 41st of 59 countries.

Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia China, Hong Kong SAR Difference Ahead
1990s 0.9907 kt 0.3659 kt 0.6247 kt Armenia
2000s 0.8934 kt 0.5813 kt 0.3121 kt Armenia
2010s 1.2 kt 0.6342 kt 0.5668 kt Armenia
2020s 1.34 kt 0.6903 kt 0.647 kt Armenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Armenia or China, Hong Kong SAR?
Armenia, at 1.05 kt against 0.6938 kt in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Armenia and China, Hong Kong SAR?
0.3562 kt, with Armenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and China, Hong Kong SAR?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Armenia and China, Hong Kong SAR rank globally for meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Armenia ranks 40th and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 41st of 59 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-buffalo-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/armenia/china-hong-kong-sar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-buffalo-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/armenia/china-hong-kong-sar/">Armenia vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
92 places, 4,069 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.