China, Hong Kong SAR vs North Macedonia: Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

China, Hong Kong SAR
0.6938 kt
in 2023
North Macedonia
1.37 kt
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
41st
North Macedonia rank
38th

Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • North Macedonia
01234196119922023

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 1.37 kt against 0.6938 kt in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 0.6762 kt.

That makes North Macedonia's figure about 2.0 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, North Macedonia has been ahead every year.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 41st and North Macedonia ranks 38th of 59 countries.

North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR North Macedonia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.3659 kt 2.37 kt 2 kt North Macedonia
2000s 0.5813 kt 1.44 kt 0.8637 kt North Macedonia
2010s 0.6342 kt 1.39 kt 0.7564 kt North Macedonia
2020s 0.6903 kt 1.38 kt 0.6895 kt North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), China, Hong Kong SAR or North Macedonia?
North Macedonia, at 1.37 kt against 0.6938 kt in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between China, Hong Kong SAR and North Macedonia?
0.6762 kt, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and North Macedonia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and North Macedonia rank globally for meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 41st and North Macedonia ranks 38th of 59 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs North Macedonia: Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-buffalo-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/china-hong-kong-sar/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-buffalo-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/china-hong-kong-sar/north-macedonia/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs North Macedonia: Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
92 places, 4,069 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.