China, Hong Kong SAR vs Singapore: Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

China, Hong Kong SAR
0.6938 kt
in 2023
Singapore
0.0308 kt
in 1991
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
41st
Singapore rank
44th

Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Singapore
02468196119922023

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 0.6938 kt against 0.0308 kt in Singapore, a difference of 0.663 kt.

That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 22.5 times Singapore's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Singapore ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 41st and Singapore ranks 44th of 59 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Singapore Difference Ahead
1960s 3.06 kt 6.62 kt 3.56 kt Singapore
1970s 1.76 kt 4.12 kt 2.36 kt Singapore
1980s 0.1951 kt 0.508 kt 0.3129 kt Singapore
1990s 0.2924 kt 0.0406 kt 0.2518 kt China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), China, Hong Kong SAR or Singapore?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 0.6938 kt against 0.0308 kt in Singapore as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between China, Hong Kong SAR and Singapore?
0.663 kt, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Singapore?
31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Singapore rank globally for meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 41st and Singapore ranks 44th of 59 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Singapore: Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-buffalo-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/china-hong-kong-sar/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-buffalo-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/china-hong-kong-sar/singapore/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Singapore: Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
92 places, 4,069 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.