Bangladesh vs Trinidad and Tobago: Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity

Bangladesh
266.68 kg CO2eq/kg
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
1,663 kg CO2eq/kg
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
4th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
1st

Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Trinidad and Tobago
5001.0k1.5k196119922023

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 1,663 kg CO2eq/kg against 266.68 kg CO2eq/kg in Bangladesh, a difference of 1,396 kg CO2eq/kg.

That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 6.2 times Bangladesh's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.

Bangladesh ranks 4th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 24 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
2010s 288.7 kg CO2eq/kg 845.51 kg CO2eq/kg 556.81 kg CO2eq/kg Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 270.84 kg CO2eq/kg 1,343 kg CO2eq/kg 1,072 kg CO2eq/kg Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, Bangladesh or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 1,663 kg CO2eq/kg against 266.68 kg CO2eq/kg in Bangladesh as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity between Bangladesh and Trinidad and Tobago?
1,396 kg CO2eq/kg, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Trinidad and Tobago?
6 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity?
Bangladesh ranks 4th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 24 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Trinidad and Tobago: Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-buffalo-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity/bangladesh/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-buffalo-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity/bangladesh/trinidad-and-tobago/">Bangladesh vs Trinidad and Tobago: Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity
Unit
kg CO2eq/kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
50 places, 2,829 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.