Singapore vs Small island developing States (SIDS): Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity

Singapore
293.8 kg CO2eq/kg
in 1987
Small island developing States (SIDS)
416.94 kg CO2eq/kg
in 2023
Singapore rank
3rd
Small island developing States (SIDS) rank
1st

Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity over time

  • Singapore
  • Small island developing States (SIDS)
0100200300400500196119922023

How they compare

Small island developing States (SIDS) currently reports 416.94 kg CO2eq/kg against 293.8 kg CO2eq/kg in Singapore, a difference of 123.14 kg CO2eq/kg.

That makes Small island developing States (SIDS)'s figure about 1.4 times Singapore's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Small island developing States (SIDS) ahead.

Singapore ranks 3rd and Small island developing States (SIDS) ranks 1st of 24 countries.

Small island developing States (SIDS) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Singapore Small island developing States (SIDS) Difference Ahead
1960s 10.4 kg CO2eq/kg 139.56 kg CO2eq/kg 129.16 kg CO2eq/kg Small island developing States (SIDS)
1970s 72.15 kg CO2eq/kg 182.94 kg CO2eq/kg 110.79 kg CO2eq/kg Small island developing States (SIDS)
1980s 94.75 kg CO2eq/kg 276.05 kg CO2eq/kg 181.3 kg CO2eq/kg Small island developing States (SIDS)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, Singapore or Small island developing States (SIDS)?
Small island developing States (SIDS), at 416.94 kg CO2eq/kg against 293.8 kg CO2eq/kg in Singapore as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity between Singapore and Small island developing States (SIDS)?
123.14 kg CO2eq/kg, with Small island developing States (SIDS) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Small island developing States (SIDS)?
27 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1987.
How do Singapore and Small island developing States (SIDS) rank globally for meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity?
Singapore ranks 3rd and Small island developing States (SIDS) ranks 1st of 24 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Singapore vs Small island developing States (SIDS): Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-buffalo-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity/singapore/small-island-developing-states-sids/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-buffalo-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity/singapore/small-island-developing-states-sids/">Singapore vs Small island developing States (SIDS): Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of buffalo, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity
Unit
kg CO2eq/kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
50 places, 2,829 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.