Antigua and Barbuda vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Antigua and Barbuda
2.91 kt
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR
2.76 kt
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
179th
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
180th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • China, Hong Kong SAR
0102030196119922023

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 2.91 kt against 2.76 kt in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 0.15 kt.

That makes Antigua and Barbuda's figure about 1.1 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 179th and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 180th of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 5 and China, Hong Kong SAR in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda China, Hong Kong SAR Difference Ahead
1960s 8.04 kt 18.77 kt 10.73 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 10 kt 15 kt 5 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 20.63 kt 3.21 kt 17.42 kt Antigua and Barbuda
1990s 17.17 kt 2.48 kt 14.69 kt Antigua and Barbuda
2000s 15.39 kt 2.65 kt 12.74 kt Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 3.24 kt 2.86 kt 0.379 kt Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 3.19 kt 2.76 kt 0.4258 kt Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Antigua and Barbuda or China, Hong Kong SAR?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 2.91 kt against 2.76 kt in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Antigua and Barbuda and China, Hong Kong SAR?
0.15 kt, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and China, Hong Kong SAR?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and China, Hong Kong SAR rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 179th and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 180th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/antigua-and-barbuda/china-hong-kong-sar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/antigua-and-barbuda/china-hong-kong-sar/">Antigua and Barbuda vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
239 places, 13,667 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.