How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Central African Republic?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belarus vs Central African Republic: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Belarus

6,057 kt

in 2023

Central African Republic

5,823 kt

in 2023

Belarus rank

56th

Central African Republic rank

58th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

Belarus
Central African Republic

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 6,057 kt against 5,823 kt in Central African Republic, a difference of 234 kt.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 56th and Central African Republic ranks 58th of 190 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belarus	Central African Republic	Difference	Ahead
1990s	7,356 kt	3,380 kt	3,975 kt	Belarus
2000s	5,330 kt	4,167 kt	1,163 kt	Belarus
2010s	6,153 kt	5,243 kt	910.25 kt	Belarus
2020s	6,102 kt	5,674 kt	427.95 kt	Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Belarus or Central African Republic?: Belarus, at 6,057 kt against 5,823 kt in Central African Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Belarus and Central African Republic?: 234 kt, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Central African Republic?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Central African Republic rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?: Belarus ranks 56th and Central African Republic ranks 58th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Central African Republic: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/belarus/central-african-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/belarus/central-african-republic/">Belarus vs Central African Republic: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit: kt
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage: 239 places, 13,667 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 13 August 2026

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.