Belgium-Luxembourg vs Zimbabwe: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Belgium-Luxembourg
5,945 kt
in 1999
Zimbabwe
6,103 kt
in 2023
Belgium-Luxembourg rank
57th
Zimbabwe rank
55th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Belgium-Luxembourg
  • Zimbabwe
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 6,103 kt against 5,945 kt in Belgium-Luxembourg, a difference of 158 kt.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 57th and Zimbabwe ranks 55th of 190 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belgium-Luxembourg averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium-Luxembourg Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 3,644 kt 4,051 kt 407.63 kt Zimbabwe
1970s 4,219 kt 6,272 kt 2,053 kt Zimbabwe
1980s 4,676 kt 5,930 kt 1,254 kt Zimbabwe
1990s 5,593 kt 5,589 kt 3.52 kt Belgium-Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Belgium-Luxembourg or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 6,103 kt against 5,945 kt in Belgium-Luxembourg as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Belgium-Luxembourg and Zimbabwe?
158 kt, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Zimbabwe?
39 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1999.
How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Zimbabwe rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 57th and Zimbabwe ranks 55th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium-Luxembourg vs Zimbabwe: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/belgium-luxembourg/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/belgium-luxembourg/zimbabwe/">Belgium-Luxembourg vs Zimbabwe: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
239 places, 13,667 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.