Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Congo: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Bosnia and Herzegovina
410.46 kt
in 2023
Congo
418.85 kt
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
128th
Congo rank
126th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Congo
0100200300400500196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 418.85 kt against 410.46 kt in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 8.39 kt.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 128th and Congo ranks 126th of 190 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Congo Difference Ahead
1990s 357.08 kt 90.34 kt 266.74 kt Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 356.06 kt 243.07 kt 112.99 kt Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 443.27 kt 431.46 kt 11.81 kt Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 434.08 kt 422.01 kt 12.07 kt Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Congo?
Congo, at 418.85 kt against 410.46 kt in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Congo?
8.39 kt, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Congo?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Congo rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 128th and Congo ranks 126th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Congo: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/bosnia-and-herzegovina/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/bosnia-and-herzegovina/congo-rep/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Congo: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
239 places, 13,667 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.