How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Finland?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Botswana vs Finland: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Botswana

1,286 kt

in 2023

Finland

1,231 kt

in 2023

Botswana rank

104th

Finland rank

106th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

Botswana
Finland

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 1,286 kt against 1,231 kt in Finland, a difference of 55 kt.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Finland ahead.

Botswana ranks 104th and Finland ranks 106th of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 6 and Finland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Botswana	Finland	Difference	Ahead
1960s	1,630 kt	2,133 kt	502.62 kt	Finland
1970s	2,833 kt	2,272 kt	560.57 kt	Botswana
1980s	3,044 kt	2,119 kt	925.28 kt	Botswana
1990s	2,887 kt	1,737 kt	1,150 kt	Botswana
2000s	2,862 kt	1,425 kt	1,436 kt	Botswana
2010s	2,249 kt	1,358 kt	891.1 kt	Botswana
2020s	1,315 kt	1,260 kt	55.06 kt	Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Botswana or Finland?: Botswana, at 1,286 kt against 1,231 kt in Finland as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Botswana and Finland?: 55 kt, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Finland?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Finland rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?: Botswana ranks 104th and Finland ranks 106th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Finland: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/botswana/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/botswana/finland/">Botswana vs Finland: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit: kt
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage: 239 places, 13,667 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 13 August 2026

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.