Canada vs Uruguay: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Canada
20,468 kt
in 2023
Uruguay
22,367 kt
in 2023
Canada rank
25th
Uruguay rank
23rd

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Canada
  • Uruguay
010.0k20.0k30.0k196119922023

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 22,367 kt against 20,468 kt in Canada, a difference of 1,899 kt.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Canada's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uruguay ahead.

Canada ranks 25th and Uruguay ranks 23rd of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 5 and Uruguay in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 17,207 kt 16,200 kt 1,007 kt Canada
1970s 21,298 kt 18,970 kt 2,328 kt Canada
1980s 19,517 kt 18,951 kt 566.08 kt Canada
1990s 22,164 kt 18,647 kt 3,516 kt Canada
2000s 25,495 kt 22,087 kt 3,408 kt Canada
2010s 21,765 kt 21,838 kt 72.85 kt Uruguay
2020s 20,793 kt 21,851 kt 1,059 kt Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Canada or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 22,367 kt against 20,468 kt in Canada as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Canada and Uruguay?
1,899 kt, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Uruguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Canada and Uruguay rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Canada ranks 25th and Uruguay ranks 23rd of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Uruguay: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/canada/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/canada/uruguay/">Canada vs Uruguay: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
239 places, 13,667 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.