China, Hong Kong SAR vs Faroe Islands: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

China, Hong Kong SAR
2.76 kt
in 2023
Faroe Islands
1.81 kt
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
180th
Faroe Islands rank
182nd

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Faroe Islands
0102030196119922023

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 2.76 kt against 1.81 kt in Faroe Islands, a difference of 0.95 kt.

That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 1.5 times Faroe Islands's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 180th and Faroe Islands ranks 182nd of 190 countries.

China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Faroe Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 18.77 kt 2.58 kt 16.18 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 15 kt 2.15 kt 12.85 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 3.21 kt 2.03 kt 1.18 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 2.48 kt 2.11 kt 0.3676 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 2.65 kt 2.16 kt 0.4937 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 2.86 kt 1.75 kt 1.11 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 2.76 kt 1.93 kt 0.8283 kt China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), China, Hong Kong SAR or Faroe Islands?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 2.76 kt against 1.81 kt in Faroe Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between China, Hong Kong SAR and Faroe Islands?
0.95 kt, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Faroe Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Faroe Islands rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 180th and Faroe Islands ranks 182nd of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Faroe Islands: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/china-hong-kong-sar/faroe-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/china-hong-kong-sar/faroe-islands/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Faroe Islands: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
239 places, 13,667 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.