Mauritius vs Sao Tome and Principe: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Mauritius
0.4573 kt
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
1.33 kt
in 2023
Mauritius rank
184th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
183rd

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Mauritius
  • Sao Tome and Principe
01020304050196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 1.33 kt against 0.4573 kt in Mauritius, a difference of 0.8727 kt.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 2.9 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 184th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 183rd of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 6 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 46.72 kt 3.56 kt 43.16 kt Mauritius
1970s 33.08 kt 2.64 kt 30.44 kt Mauritius
1980s 31.53 kt 3.28 kt 28.24 kt Mauritius
1990s 24.4 kt 3.88 kt 20.52 kt Mauritius
2000s 7.85 kt 3.13 kt 4.73 kt Mauritius
2010s 2.12 kt 1.11 kt 1.01 kt Mauritius
2020s 1.04 kt 1.31 kt 0.273 kt Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Mauritius or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 1.33 kt against 0.4573 kt in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Mauritius and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.8727 kt, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Mauritius ranks 184th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 183rd of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Sao Tome and Principe: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/mauritius/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/mauritius/sao-tome-and-principe/">Mauritius vs Sao Tome and Principe: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
239 places, 13,667 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.