Suriname vs Trinidad and Tobago: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Suriname
61.87 kt
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
57.66 kt
in 2023
Suriname rank
152nd
Trinidad and Tobago rank
154th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Suriname
  • Trinidad and Tobago
050100150200250196119922023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 61.87 kt against 57.66 kt in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 4.21 kt.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Suriname ranks 152nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 154th of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Suriname averaged higher in 5 and Trinidad and Tobago in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Suriname Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 68.46 kt 101.88 kt 33.42 kt Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 54.22 kt 132.61 kt 78.38 kt Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 114.62 kt 109.1 kt 5.52 kt Suriname
1990s 182.23 kt 44.18 kt 138.05 kt Suriname
2000s 104.38 kt 31.57 kt 72.81 kt Suriname
2010s 82.95 kt 50.89 kt 32.07 kt Suriname
2020s 66.99 kt 56.66 kt 10.33 kt Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Suriname or Trinidad and Tobago?
Suriname, at 61.87 kt against 57.66 kt in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Suriname and Trinidad and Tobago?
4.21 kt, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Suriname and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Suriname ranks 152nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 154th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Suriname vs Trinidad and Tobago: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/suriname/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/suriname/trinidad-and-tobago/">Suriname vs Trinidad and Tobago: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
239 places, 13,667 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.