Mauritania vs New Caledonia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity

Mauritania
63.08 kg CO2eq/kg
in 2023
New Caledonia
61.1 kg CO2eq/kg
in 2023
Mauritania rank
50th
New Caledonia rank
53rd

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity over time

  • Mauritania
  • New Caledonia
50100150200250196119922023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 63.08 kg CO2eq/kg against 61.1 kg CO2eq/kg in New Caledonia, a difference of 1.98 kg CO2eq/kg.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritania ahead.

Mauritania ranks 50th and New Caledonia ranks 53rd of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 5 and New Caledonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1960s 213.75 kg CO2eq/kg 77.76 kg CO2eq/kg 135.99 kg CO2eq/kg Mauritania
1970s 134.14 kg CO2eq/kg 95.77 kg CO2eq/kg 38.37 kg CO2eq/kg Mauritania
1980s 77.88 kg CO2eq/kg 108.49 kg CO2eq/kg 30.61 kg CO2eq/kg New Caledonia
1990s 98.28 kg CO2eq/kg 73.3 kg CO2eq/kg 24.98 kg CO2eq/kg Mauritania
2000s 63.74 kg CO2eq/kg 65.97 kg CO2eq/kg 2.23 kg CO2eq/kg New Caledonia
2010s 64.17 kg CO2eq/kg 62.74 kg CO2eq/kg 1.43 kg CO2eq/kg Mauritania
2020s 64.2 kg CO2eq/kg 62.12 kg CO2eq/kg 2.08 kg CO2eq/kg Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, Mauritania or New Caledonia?
Mauritania, at 63.08 kg CO2eq/kg against 61.1 kg CO2eq/kg in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity between Mauritania and New Caledonia?
1.98 kg CO2eq/kg, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and New Caledonia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritania and New Caledonia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity?
Mauritania ranks 50th and New Caledonia ranks 53rd of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs New Caledonia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity/mauritania/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity/mauritania/new-caledonia/">Mauritania vs New Caledonia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity
Unit
kg CO2eq/kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
238 places, 13,533 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.