Sri Lanka vs Suriname: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity

Sri Lanka
36.88 kg CO2eq/kg
in 2023
Suriname
37.44 kg CO2eq/kg
in 2023
Sri Lanka rank
93rd
Suriname rank
90th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity over time

  • Sri Lanka
  • Suriname
20406080100196119922023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 37.44 kg CO2eq/kg against 36.88 kg CO2eq/kg in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.56 kg CO2eq/kg.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Suriname ahead.

Sri Lanka ranks 93rd and Suriname ranks 90th of 189 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sri Lanka Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 40.7 kg CO2eq/kg 74.14 kg CO2eq/kg 33.44 kg CO2eq/kg Suriname
1970s 41.13 kg CO2eq/kg 51.64 kg CO2eq/kg 10.51 kg CO2eq/kg Suriname
1980s 54.46 kg CO2eq/kg 81.83 kg CO2eq/kg 27.37 kg CO2eq/kg Suriname
1990s 45.88 kg CO2eq/kg 85.87 kg CO2eq/kg 39.98 kg CO2eq/kg Suriname
2000s 32.23 kg CO2eq/kg 61 kg CO2eq/kg 28.77 kg CO2eq/kg Suriname
2010s 32.81 kg CO2eq/kg 47.08 kg CO2eq/kg 14.27 kg CO2eq/kg Suriname
2020s 35.73 kg CO2eq/kg 38.23 kg CO2eq/kg 2.5 kg CO2eq/kg Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, Sri Lanka or Suriname?
Suriname, at 37.44 kg CO2eq/kg against 36.88 kg CO2eq/kg in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity between Sri Lanka and Suriname?
0.56 kg CO2eq/kg, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Suriname?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Sri Lanka and Suriname rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity?
Sri Lanka ranks 93rd and Suriname ranks 90th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sri Lanka vs Suriname: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity/sri-lanka/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity/sri-lanka/suriname/">Sri Lanka vs Suriname: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity
Unit
kg CO2eq/kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
238 places, 13,533 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.