Iceland vs South Sudan: Meat of cattle: Production, per capita … cattle capita Production
Iceland
0.0127 t per person
in 2023
South Sudan
0.0124 t per person
in 2023
Iceland rank
43rd
South Sudan rank
44th
Meat of cattle: Production, per capita … cattle capita Production over time
- Iceland
- South Sudan
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0.0127 t per person against 0.0124 t per person in South Sudan, a difference of 0.0003 t per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 43rd and South Sudan ranks 44th of 167 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0126 t per person | 0.0101 t per person | 0.0024 t per person | Iceland |
| 2020s | 0.0129 t per person | 0.0123 t per person | 0.0006 t per person | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, per, Iceland or South Sudan?
- Iceland, at 0.0127 t per person against 0.0124 t per person in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, per between Iceland and South Sudan?
- 0.0003 t per person, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Iceland and South Sudan rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, per?
- Iceland ranks 43rd and South Sudan ranks 44th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.