China, Macao SAR vs Solomon Islands: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production

China, Macao SAR
731.08 t
in 2023
Solomon Islands
776.62 t
in 2023
China, Macao SAR rank
171st
Solomon Islands rank
170th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production over time

  • China, Macao SAR
  • Solomon Islands
05001.0k1.5k2.0k196119922023

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports 776.62 t against 731.08 t in China, Macao SAR, a difference of 45.54 t.

That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 1.1 times China, Macao SAR's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Macao SAR ahead.

China, Macao SAR ranks 171st and Solomon Islands ranks 170th of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Macao SAR averaged higher in 5 and Solomon Islands in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Macao SAR Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 661.83 t 229.42 t 432.41 t China, Macao SAR
1970s 1,285 t 716.32 t 568.97 t China, Macao SAR
1980s 708.23 t 811.23 t 103 t Solomon Islands
1990s 1,304 t 610.5 t 693.89 t China, Macao SAR
2000s 1,067 t 682.65 t 384.64 t China, Macao SAR
2010s 828.9 t 750.76 t 78.14 t China, Macao SAR
2020s 748.25 t 771.02 t 22.77 t Solomon Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, China, Macao SAR or Solomon Islands?
Solomon Islands, at 776.62 t against 731.08 t in China, Macao SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production between China, Macao SAR and Solomon Islands?
45.54 t, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao SAR and Solomon Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Macao SAR and Solomon Islands rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production?
China, Macao SAR ranks 171st and Solomon Islands ranks 170th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Macao SAR vs Solomon Islands: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-production/china-macao-sar/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-production/china-macao-sar/solomon-islands/">China, Macao SAR vs Solomon Islands: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
239 places, 13,601 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.