Barbados vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Barbados
14.97 kt
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR
15.76 kt
in 2023
Barbados rank
129th
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
126th

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Barbados
  • China, Hong Kong SAR
0510152025196119922023

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 15.76 kt against 14.97 kt in Barbados, a difference of 0.79 kt.

That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 1.1 times Barbados's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

Barbados ranks 129th and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 126th of 193 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 2 and China, Hong Kong SAR in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados China, Hong Kong SAR Difference Ahead
1960s 0.9162 kt 8.73 kt 7.82 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 2.65 kt 17.37 kt 14.71 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 6.47 kt 22.45 kt 15.98 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 8.72 kt 13 kt 4.28 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 9.38 kt 3.75 kt 5.63 kt Barbados
2010s 12.06 kt 10.02 kt 2.03 kt Barbados
2020s 14.96 kt 15.75 kt 0.7871 kt China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Barbados or China, Hong Kong SAR?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 15.76 kt against 14.97 kt in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Barbados and China, Hong Kong SAR?
0.79 kt, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and China, Hong Kong SAR?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and China, Hong Kong SAR rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Barbados ranks 129th and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 126th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/barbados/china-hong-kong-sar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/barbados/china-hong-kong-sar/">Barbados vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
242 places, 13,830 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.