Ethiopia PDR vs Sao Tome and Principe: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity

Ethiopia PDR
1.26 kg CO2eq/kg
in 1992
Sao Tome and Principe
1.25 kg CO2eq/kg
in 2023
Ethiopia PDR rank
71st
Sao Tome and Principe rank
72nd

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity over time

  • Ethiopia PDR
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0.511.522.5196119922023

How they compare

Ethiopia PDR currently reports 1.26 kg CO2eq/kg against 1.25 kg CO2eq/kg in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.01 kg CO2eq/kg.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.

Ethiopia PDR ranks 71st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 72nd of 192 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia PDR Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 1.51 kg CO2eq/kg 2.26 kg CO2eq/kg 0.7525 kg CO2eq/kg Sao Tome and Principe
1970s 1.41 kg CO2eq/kg 2.17 kg CO2eq/kg 0.7539 kg CO2eq/kg Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 1.21 kg CO2eq/kg 1.46 kg CO2eq/kg 0.2433 kg CO2eq/kg Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 1.26 kg CO2eq/kg 1.65 kg CO2eq/kg 0.3909 kg CO2eq/kg Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, Ethiopia PDR or Sao Tome and Principe?
Ethiopia PDR, at 1.26 kg CO2eq/kg against 1.25 kg CO2eq/kg in Sao Tome and Principe as of 1992.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity between Ethiopia PDR and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.01 kg CO2eq/kg, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Sao Tome and Principe?
32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
How do Ethiopia PDR and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity?
Ethiopia PDR ranks 71st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 72nd of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia PDR vs Sao Tome and Principe: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity/ethiopia-pdr/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-intensity/ethiopia-pdr/sao-tome-and-principe/">Ethiopia PDR vs Sao Tome and Principe: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity
Unit
kg CO2eq/kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
241 places, 13,757 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.