China, Hong Kong SAR vs Malta: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

China, Hong Kong SAR
0.1538 kt
in 2023
Malta
0.3057 kt
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
179th
Malta rank
176th

Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Malta
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.3057 kt against 0.1538 kt in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 0.1519 kt.

That makes Malta's figure about 2.0 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 179th and Malta ranks 176th of 182 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Malta Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0763 kt 1.17 kt 1.09 kt Malta
1970s 0.0829 kt 0.5196 kt 0.4367 kt Malta
1980s 0.1071 kt 0.2152 kt 0.1081 kt Malta
1990s 0.0693 kt 0.7317 kt 0.6623 kt Malta
2000s 0.1124 kt 0.467 kt 0.3546 kt Malta
2010s 0.1521 kt 0.3987 kt 0.2465 kt Malta
2020s 0.1538 kt 0.2874 kt 0.1336 kt Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), China, Hong Kong SAR or Malta?
Malta, at 0.3057 kt against 0.1538 kt in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between China, Hong Kong SAR and Malta?
0.1519 kt, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Malta?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Malta rank globally for meat of goat, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 179th and Malta ranks 176th of 182 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Malta: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/china-hong-kong-sar/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/china-hong-kong-sar/malta/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Malta: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of goat, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
231 places, 13,038 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.