How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Montenegro?

18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Ecuador vs Montenegro: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Ecuador

0 kt per person

in 2023

Montenegro

0 kt per person

in 2023

Ecuador rank

97th

Montenegro rank

98th

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

Ecuador
Montenegro

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Montenegro, a difference of 0 kt per person.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 97th and Montenegro ranks 98th of 149 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Ecuador	Montenegro	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	Ecuador
2010s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	Ecuador
2020s	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	0 kt per person	Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Ecuador or Montenegro?: Ecuador, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Montenegro as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Ecuador and Montenegro?: 0 kt per person, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Montenegro?: 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Montenegro rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?: Ecuador ranks 97th and Montenegro ranks 98th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Montenegro: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/ecuador/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/ecuador/montenegro/">Ecuador vs Montenegro: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit: kt per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 150 places, 8,626 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.