China, Hong Kong SAR vs Namibia: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

China, Hong Kong SAR
24.83 kt
in 2023
Namibia
25.26 kt
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
117th
Namibia rank
116th

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Namibia
0255075100125196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 25.26 kt against 24.83 kt in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 0.43 kt.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 117th and Namibia ranks 116th of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 6 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 62.94 kt 5.02 kt 57.92 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 95.33 kt 4.61 kt 90.72 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 94.12 kt 4.49 kt 89.63 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 35.47 kt 4.53 kt 30.94 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 39.92 kt 9.91 kt 30.01 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 29.06 kt 20.66 kt 8.4 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 24.83 kt 26.56 kt 1.73 kt Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), China, Hong Kong SAR or Namibia?
Namibia, at 25.26 kt against 24.83 kt in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between China, Hong Kong SAR and Namibia?
0.43 kt, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Namibia rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 117th and Namibia ranks 116th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Namibia: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/china-hong-kong-sar/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/china-hong-kong-sar/namibia/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Namibia: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
221 places, 12,678 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.