Iceland vs Trinidad and Tobago: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)

Iceland
7.53 kt
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
6.81 kt
in 2023
Iceland rank
133rd
Trinidad and Tobago rank
136th

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Iceland
  • Trinidad and Tobago
051015196119922023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 7.53 kt against 6.81 kt in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.72 kt.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Iceland ranks 133rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 136th of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 4 and Trinidad and Tobago in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 0.6917 kt 7.75 kt 7.06 kt Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 1.83 kt 11.15 kt 9.32 kt Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 6.25 kt 12.61 kt 6.36 kt Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 11.91 kt 8.42 kt 3.49 kt Iceland
2000s 12.15 kt 9.78 kt 2.37 kt Iceland
2010s 8.92 kt 7.37 kt 1.55 kt Iceland
2020s 7.61 kt 7.37 kt 0.2364 kt Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq), Iceland or Trinidad and Tobago?
Iceland, at 7.53 kt against 6.81 kt in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq) between Iceland and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.72 kt, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — emissions (co2eq)?
Iceland ranks 133rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 136th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Trinidad and Tobago: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/iceland/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-emissions-co2eq-ar5/iceland/trinidad-and-tobago/">Iceland vs Trinidad and Tobago: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
221 places, 12,678 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.