Botswana vs Croatia: Millet — Crop residues
Millet — Crop residues over time
- Botswana
- Croatia
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 0.0002 kt against 0.0001 kt in Croatia, a difference of 0.0001 kt.
That makes Botswana's figure about 2.0 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.
Botswana ranks 72nd and Croatia ranks 74th of 87 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0005 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0004 kt | Botswana |
| 2000s | 0.0002 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | Botswana |
| 2010s | 0.0006 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0005 kt | Botswana |
| 2030s | 0.0002 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | Botswana |
| 2050s | 0.0002 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher millet — crop residues, Botswana or Croatia?
- Botswana, at 0.0002 kt against 0.0001 kt in Croatia as of 2050.
- What is the difference in millet — crop residues between Botswana and Croatia?
- 0.0001 kt, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Croatia?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2050.
- How do Botswana and Croatia rank globally for millet — crop residues?
- Botswana ranks 72nd and Croatia ranks 74th of 87 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Millet — Crop residues (Emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).