China vs Cuba: Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land)
China
0 kt
in 2025
Cuba
0 kt
in 2025
China rank
97th
Cuba rank
97th
Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land) over time
- China
- Cuba
How they compare
China currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Cuba, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Cuba ahead.
China ranks 97th and Cuba ranks 97th of 223 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and Cuba in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 308.19 kt | 308.19 kt | Cuba |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 30.82 kt | 30.82 kt | Cuba |
| 2010s | 2,558 kt | 461.56 kt | 2,097 kt | China |
| 2020s | 1,066 kt | 192.32 kt | 873.59 kt | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2), China or Cuba?
- China, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Cuba as of 2025.
- What is the difference in net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) between China and Cuba?
- 0 kt, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Cuba?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do China and Cuba rank globally for net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2)?
- China ranks 97th and Cuba ranks 97th of 223 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).