Statizoid

Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) in Cuba

Cuba: Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) was 0 kt in 2025. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2025)
0 kt
World rank
96th
of 217 countries
All-time high
1,154 kt
in 2016
All-time low
0 kt
in 2001
Years of data
36
1990–2025

Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) in Cuba, 1990–2025

02505007501.0k1.2k1990200720251990: 308.2 kt1991: 308.2 kt1992: 308.2 kt1993: 308.2 kt1994: 308.2 kt1995: 308.2 kt1996: 308.2 kt1997: 308.2 kt1998: 308.2 kt1999: 308.2 kt2000: 308.2 kt2001: 0 kt2002: 0 kt2003: 0 kt2004: 0 kt2005: 0 kt2006: 0 kt2007: 0 kt2008: 0 kt2009: 0 kt2010: 0 kt2011: 0 kt2012: 0 kt2013: 0 kt2014: 0 kt2015: 0 kt2016: 1.2k kt2017: 1.2k kt2018: 1.2k kt2019: 1.2k kt2020: 1.2k kt2021: 0 kt2022: 0 kt2023: 0 kt2024: 0 kt2025: 0 kt

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in kt.

Analysis

In 2025, net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) in Cuba stood at 0 kt. That is the lowest value across all 36 years on record.

The figure is down 100.0% over five years.

Over the whole period, net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) in Cuba peaked at 1,154 kt in 2016 and was at its lowest, 0 kt, in 2001.

That places Cuba 96th out of 217 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 308.19 kt 308.19 kt 308.19 kt 10
2000s 30.82 kt 0 kt 308.19 kt 10
2010s 461.56 kt 0 kt 1,154 kt 10
2020s 192.32 kt 0 kt 1,154 kt 6

Countries ranked near Cuba

  1. 93 Cyprus 15.53 kt compare
  2. 94 Saint Pierre and Miquelon 1.45 kt compare
  3. 95 Jordan 0.502 kt compare
  4. 96 Afghanistan 0 kt compare
  5. 96 Albania 0 kt compare
  6. 96 American Samoa 0 kt compare
  7. 96 Andorra 0 kt compare
  8. 96 Armenia 0 kt compare
  9. 96 Aruba 0 kt compare
  10. 96 Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha 0 kt compare
  11. 96 Azerbaijan 0 kt compare
  12. 96 Bahamas 0 kt compare
  13. 96 Bahrain 0 kt compare
  14. 96 Barbados 0 kt compare
  15. 96 Belarus 0 kt compare
  16. 96 Belgium 0 kt compare
  17. 96 Bermuda 0 kt compare
  18. 96 Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba 0 kt compare
  19. 96 Botswana 0 kt compare
  20. 96 British Virgin Islands 0 kt compare
  21. 96 Burundi 0 kt compare
  22. 96 Cayman Islands 0 kt compare
  23. 96 China (People’s Republic of) 0 kt compare
  24. 96 China, mainland 0 kt compare
  25. 96 Comoros 0 kt compare
  26. 96 Curaçao 0 kt compare
  27. 96 Czechia 0 kt compare
  28. 96 Denmark 0 kt compare
  29. 96 Djibouti 0 kt compare
  30. 96 Dominican Republic 0 kt compare
  31. 96 Egypt 0 kt compare
  32. 96 El Salvador 0 kt compare
  33. 96 Falkland Islands (Malvinas) 0 kt compare
  34. 96 Faroe Islands 0 kt compare
  35. 96 Fiji 0 kt compare
  36. 96 Finland 0 kt compare
  37. 96 France 0 kt compare
  38. 96 French Polynesia 0 kt compare
  39. 96 Georgia 0 kt compare
  40. 96 Germany 0 kt compare
  41. 96 Ghana 0 kt compare
  42. 96 Gibraltar 0 kt compare
  43. 96 Greece 0 kt compare
  44. 96 Greenland 0 kt compare
  45. 96 Grenada 0 kt compare
  46. 96 Guadeloupe 0 kt compare
  47. 96 Guam 0 kt compare
  48. 96 Haiti 0 kt compare
  49. 96 Holy See 0 kt compare
  50. 96 Hungary 0 kt compare
  51. 96 Iceland 0 kt compare
  52. 96 India 0 kt compare
  53. 96 Indonesia 0 kt compare
  54. 96 Ireland 0 kt compare
  55. 96 Isle of Man 0 kt compare
  56. 96 Jamaica 0 kt compare
  57. 96 Jersey 0 kt compare
  58. 96 Kazakhstan 0 kt compare
  59. 96 Kenya 0 kt compare
  60. 96 Kiribati 0 kt compare
  61. 96 Kuwait 0 kt compare
  62. 96 Kyrgyzstan 0 kt compare
  63. 96 Latvia 0 kt compare
  64. 96 Lebanon 0 kt compare
  65. 96 Lesotho 0 kt compare
  66. 96 Liechtenstein 0 kt compare
  67. 96 Lithuania 0 kt compare
  68. 96 Luxembourg 0 kt compare
  69. 96 Maldives 0 kt compare
  70. 96 Malta 0 kt compare
  71. 96 Marshall Islands 0 kt compare
  72. 96 Martinique 0 kt compare
  73. 96 Mauritius 0 kt compare
  74. 96 Monaco 0 kt compare
  75. 96 Mongolia 0 kt compare
  76. 96 Montenegro 0 kt compare
  77. 96 Nauru 0 kt compare
  78. 96 Nepal 0 kt compare
  79. 96 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 kt compare
  80. 96 New Caledonia 0 kt compare
  81. 96 New Zealand 0 kt compare
  82. 96 Norfolk Island 0 kt compare
  83. 96 Northern Mariana Islands 0 kt compare
  84. 96 Oman 0 kt compare
  85. 96 Pakistan 0 kt compare
  86. 96 Palau 0 kt compare
  87. 96 Palestinian Authority or West Bank and Gaza Strip 0 kt compare
  88. 96 Philippines 0 kt compare
  89. 96 Pitcairn 0 kt compare
  90. 96 Poland 0 kt compare
  91. 96 Portugal 0 kt compare
  92. 96 Qatar 0 kt compare
  93. 96 Réunion 0 kt compare
  94. 96 Russian Federation 0 kt compare
  95. 96 Rwanda 0 kt compare
  96. 96 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 kt compare
  97. 96 Saint Lucia 0 kt compare
  98. 96 Saint Martin 0 kt compare
  99. 96 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 kt compare
  100. 96 San Marino 0 kt compare
  101. 96 Sao Tome and Principe 0 kt compare
  102. 96 Saudi Arabia 0 kt compare
  103. 96 Serbia 0 kt compare
  104. 96 Serbia and Montenegro 0 kt compare
  105. 96 Singapore 0 kt compare
  106. 96 Sint Maarten 0 kt compare
  107. 96 Slovak Republic 0 kt compare
  108. 96 South Africa 0 kt compare
  109. 96 South Sudan 0 kt compare
  110. 96 Spain 0 kt compare
  111. 96 Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands 0 kt compare
  112. 96 Switzerland 0 kt compare
  113. 96 Tajikistan 0 kt compare
  114. 96 Tonga 0 kt compare
  115. 96 Turkmenistan 0 kt compare
  116. 96 Turks and Caicos Islands 0 kt compare
  117. 96 Tuvalu 0 kt compare
  118. 96 Ukraine 0 kt compare
  119. 96 United Arab Emirates 0 kt compare
  120. 96 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 kt compare
  121. 96 United States Virgin Islands 0 kt compare
  122. 96 Uruguay 0 kt compare
  123. 96 Uzbekistan 0 kt compare
  124. 96 Yemen 0 kt compare

See the full ranking of 275 places →

More climate change data for Cuba

All data for Cuba →

Frequently asked questions

What is net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) in Cuba?
Net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) in Cuba was 0 kt in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) recorded in Cuba?
The highest recorded value was 1,154 kt in 2016.
What is the lowest net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) recorded in Cuba?
The lowest recorded value was 0 kt in 2001.
How does Cuba rank for net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2)?
Cuba ranks 96th out of 217 countries with data for 2025.
Where does this Cuba data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 36 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) in Cuba. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/stat/net-forest-conversion-net-emissions-removals-co2-forest-land-fao-tier-1/cuba/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/stat/net-forest-conversion-net-emissions-removals-co2-forest-land-fao-tier-1/cuba/">Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) in Cuba</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
275 places, 9,600 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).