Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) in Nepal

Nepal: Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) was 0 kt in 2025. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2025)
0 kt
World rank
96th
of 217 countries
All-time high
14.48 kt
in 2016
All-time low
0 kt
in 1990
Years of data
36
1990–2025

Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) in Nepal, 1990–2025

0510151990200720251990: 0 kt1991: 0 kt1992: 0 kt1993: 0 kt1994: 0 kt1995: 0 kt1996: 0 kt1997: 0 kt1998: 0 kt1999: 0 kt2000: 0 kt2001: 0 kt2002: 0 kt2003: 0 kt2004: 0 kt2005: 0 kt2006: 0 kt2007: 0 kt2008: 0 kt2009: 0 kt2010: 0 kt2011: 7.5 kt2012: 7.5 kt2013: 7.5 kt2014: 7.5 kt2015: 7.5 kt2016: 14.5 kt2017: 14.5 kt2018: 14.5 kt2019: 14.5 kt2020: 14.5 kt2021: 0 kt2022: 0 kt2023: 0 kt2024: 0 kt2025: 0 kt

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in kt.

Analysis

Nepal recorded 0 kt for net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 36 years on record.

The figure is down 100.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) in Nepal peaked at 14.48 kt in 2016 and was at its lowest, 0 kt, in 1990.

Nepal ranks 96th of 217 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 0 kt 0 kt 0 kt 10
2000s 0 kt 0 kt 0 kt 10
2010s 9.53 kt 0 kt 14.48 kt 10
2020s 2.41 kt 0 kt 14.48 kt 6

Countries ranked near Nepal

  1. 93 Cyprus 15.53 kt compare
  2. 94 Saint Pierre and Miquelon 1.45 kt compare
  3. 95 Jordan 0.502 kt compare
  4. 96 Afghanistan 0 kt
  5. 96 Albania 0 kt compare
  6. 96 American Samoa 0 kt compare
  7. 96 Andorra 0 kt compare
  8. 96 Armenia 0 kt compare
  9. 96 Aruba 0 kt
  10. 96 Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha 0 kt
  11. 96 Azerbaijan 0 kt compare
  12. 96 Bahamas 0 kt
  13. 96 Bahrain 0 kt
  14. 96 Barbados 0 kt
  15. 96 Belarus 0 kt compare
  16. 96 Belgium 0 kt compare
  17. 96 Bermuda 0 kt
  18. 96 Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba 0 kt
  19. 96 Botswana 0 kt
  20. 96 British Virgin Islands 0 kt compare
  21. 96 Burundi 0 kt compare
  22. 96 Cayman Islands 0 kt compare
  23. 96 China 0 kt compare
  24. 96 China, mainland 0 kt compare
  25. 96 Comoros 0 kt compare
  26. 96 Cuba 0 kt compare
  27. 96 Curaçao 0 kt
  28. 96 Czechia 0 kt compare
  29. 96 Denmark 0 kt compare
  30. 96 Djibouti 0 kt
  31. 96 Dominican Republic 0 kt compare
  32. 96 Egypt 0 kt
  33. 96 El Salvador 0 kt compare
  34. 96 Falkland Islands (Malvinas) 0 kt
  35. 96 Faroe Islands 0 kt
  36. 96 Fiji 0 kt
  37. 96 Finland 0 kt compare
  38. 96 France 0 kt
  39. 96 French Polynesia 0 kt
  40. 96 Georgia 0 kt
  41. 96 Germany 0 kt
  42. 96 Ghana 0 kt
  43. 96 Gibraltar 0 kt
  44. 96 Greece 0 kt
  45. 96 Greenland 0 kt
  46. 96 Grenada 0 kt
  47. 96 Guadeloupe 0 kt compare
  48. 96 Guam 0 kt
  49. 96 Haiti 0 kt compare
  50. 96 Holy See 0 kt
  51. 96 Hungary 0 kt compare
  52. 96 Iceland 0 kt
  53. 96 India 0 kt
  54. 96 Indonesia 0 kt compare
  55. 96 Ireland 0 kt compare
  56. 96 Isle of Man 0 kt
  57. 96 Jamaica 0 kt compare
  58. 96 Jersey 0 kt
  59. 96 Kazakhstan 0 kt compare
  60. 96 Kenya 0 kt compare
  61. 96 Kiribati 0 kt
  62. 96 Kuwait 0 kt
  63. 96 Kyrgyzstan 0 kt compare
  64. 96 Latvia 0 kt compare
  65. 96 Lebanon 0 kt
  66. 96 Lesotho 0 kt
  67. 96 Liechtenstein 0 kt
  68. 96 Lithuania 0 kt compare
  69. 96 Luxembourg 0 kt compare
  70. 96 Maldives 0 kt
  71. 96 Malta 0 kt
  72. 96 Marshall Islands 0 kt compare
  73. 96 Martinique 0 kt
  74. 96 Mauritius 0 kt compare
  75. 96 Monaco 0 kt
  76. 96 Mongolia 0 kt compare
  77. 96 Montenegro 0 kt
  78. 96 Nauru 0 kt
  79. 96 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 kt compare
  80. 96 New Caledonia 0 kt compare
  81. 96 New Zealand 0 kt compare
  82. 96 Norfolk Island 0 kt
  83. 96 Northern Mariana Islands 0 kt
  84. 96 Oman 0 kt
  85. 96 Pakistan 0 kt compare
  86. 96 Palau 0 kt
  87. 96 State of Palestine 0 kt
  88. 96 Philippines 0 kt compare
  89. 96 Pitcairn 0 kt
  90. 96 Poland 0 kt
  91. 96 Portugal 0 kt compare
  92. 96 Qatar 0 kt
  93. 96 Réunion 0 kt
  94. 96 Russian Federation 0 kt compare
  95. 96 Rwanda 0 kt compare
  96. 96 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 kt
  97. 96 Saint Lucia 0 kt
  98. 96 Saint Martin (French part) 0 kt
  99. 96 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 kt compare
  100. 96 San Marino 0 kt
  101. 96 Sao Tome and Principe 0 kt compare
  102. 96 Saudi Arabia 0 kt
  103. 96 Serbia 0 kt
  104. 96 Serbia and Montenegro 0 kt
  105. 96 Singapore 0 kt compare
  106. 96 Sint Maarten 0 kt
  107. 96 Slovak Republic 0 kt compare
  108. 96 South Africa 0 kt
  109. 96 South Sudan 0 kt compare
  110. 96 Spain 0 kt compare
  111. 96 Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands 0 kt
  112. 96 Switzerland 0 kt compare
  113. 96 Tajikistan 0 kt
  114. 96 Tonga 0 kt
  115. 96 Turkmenistan 0 kt
  116. 96 Turks and Caicos Islands 0 kt
  117. 96 Tuvalu 0 kt
  118. 96 Ukraine 0 kt compare
  119. 96 United Arab Emirates 0 kt
  120. 96 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 kt
  121. 96 Virgin Islands U.S. 0 kt compare
  122. 96 Uruguay 0 kt
  123. 96 Uzbekistan 0 kt compare
  124. 96 Yemen 0 kt

See the full ranking of 275 places →

More climate change data for Nepal

All data for Nepal →

Frequently asked questions

What is net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) in Nepal?
Net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) in Nepal was 0 kt in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) recorded in Nepal?
The highest recorded value was 14.48 kt in 2016.
What is the lowest net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) recorded in Nepal?
The lowest recorded value was 0 kt in 1990.
How does Nepal rank for net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2)?
Nepal ranks 96th out of 217 countries with data for 2025.
Is net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) rising or falling in Nepal?
Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Nepal data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 36 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) in Nepal. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/stat/net-forest-conversion-net-emissions-removals-co2-forest-land-fao-tier-1/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/stat/net-forest-conversion-net-emissions-removals-co2-forest-land-fao-tier-1/nepal/">Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) in Nepal</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
275 places, 9,600 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).