Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) in Belarus
Belarus: Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) was 0 kt in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
0 kt
World rank
96th
of 217 countries
All-time high
3,517 kt
in 2011
All-time low
0 kt
in 2001
Years of data
34
1992–2025
Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) in Belarus, 1992–2025
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in kt.
Analysis
Belarus recorded 0 kt for net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 34 years on record.
The figure is down 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) in Belarus peaked at 3,517 kt in 2011 and was at its lowest, 0 kt, in 2001.
That places Belarus 96th out of 217 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,968 kt | 2,968 kt | 2,968 kt | 8 |
| 2000s | 296.81 kt | 0 kt | 2,968 kt | 10 |
| 2010s | 1,758 kt | 0 kt | 3,517 kt | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | 6 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 93 Cyprus 15.53 kt compare
- 94 Saint Pierre and Miquelon 1.45 kt compare
- 95 Jordan 0.502 kt compare
- 96 Afghanistan 0 kt compare
- 96 Albania 0 kt compare
- 96 American Samoa 0 kt compare
- 96 Andorra 0 kt compare
- 96 Armenia 0 kt compare
- 96 Aruba 0 kt compare
- 96 Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha 0 kt compare
- 96 Azerbaijan 0 kt compare
- 96 Bahamas 0 kt compare
- 96 Bahrain 0 kt compare
- 96 Barbados 0 kt compare
- 96 Belgium 0 kt compare
- 96 Bermuda 0 kt compare
- 96 Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba 0 kt compare
- 96 Botswana 0 kt compare
- 96 British Virgin Islands 0 kt compare
- 96 Burundi 0 kt compare
- 96 Cayman Islands 0 kt compare
- 96 China 0 kt compare
- 96 China, mainland 0 kt compare
- 96 Comoros 0 kt compare
- 96 Cuba 0 kt compare
- 96 Curaçao 0 kt compare
- 96 Czechia 0 kt compare
- 96 Denmark 0 kt compare
- 96 Djibouti 0 kt compare
- 96 Dominican Republic 0 kt compare
- 96 Egypt 0 kt compare
- 96 El Salvador 0 kt compare
- 96 Falkland Islands (Malvinas) 0 kt compare
- 96 Faroe Islands 0 kt compare
- 96 Fiji 0 kt compare
- 96 Finland 0 kt compare
- 96 France 0 kt compare
- 96 French Polynesia 0 kt compare
- 96 Georgia 0 kt compare
- 96 Germany 0 kt compare
- 96 Ghana 0 kt compare
- 96 Gibraltar 0 kt compare
- 96 Greece 0 kt compare
- 96 Greenland 0 kt compare
- 96 Grenada 0 kt compare
- 96 Guadeloupe 0 kt compare
- 96 Guam 0 kt compare
- 96 Haiti 0 kt compare
- 96 Holy See 0 kt compare
- 96 Hungary 0 kt compare
- 96 Iceland 0 kt compare
- 96 India 0 kt compare
- 96 Indonesia 0 kt compare
- 96 Ireland 0 kt compare
- 96 Isle of Man 0 kt compare
- 96 Jamaica 0 kt compare
- 96 Jersey 0 kt compare
- 96 Kazakhstan 0 kt compare
- 96 Kenya 0 kt compare
- 96 Kiribati 0 kt compare
- 96 Kuwait 0 kt compare
- 96 Kyrgyzstan 0 kt compare
- 96 Latvia 0 kt compare
- 96 Lebanon 0 kt compare
- 96 Lesotho 0 kt compare
- 96 Liechtenstein 0 kt compare
- 96 Lithuania 0 kt compare
- 96 Luxembourg 0 kt compare
- 96 Maldives 0 kt compare
- 96 Malta 0 kt compare
- 96 Marshall Islands 0 kt compare
- 96 Martinique 0 kt compare
- 96 Mauritius 0 kt compare
- 96 Monaco 0 kt compare
- 96 Mongolia 0 kt compare
- 96 Montenegro 0 kt compare
- 96 Nauru 0 kt compare
- 96 Nepal 0 kt compare
- 96 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 kt compare
- 96 New Caledonia 0 kt compare
- 96 New Zealand 0 kt compare
- 96 Norfolk Island 0 kt compare
- 96 Northern Mariana Islands 0 kt compare
- 96 Oman 0 kt compare
- 96 Pakistan 0 kt compare
- 96 Palau 0 kt compare
- 96 Palestine, State of 0 kt compare
- 96 Philippines 0 kt compare
- 96 Pitcairn 0 kt compare
- 96 Poland 0 kt compare
- 96 Portugal 0 kt compare
- 96 Qatar 0 kt compare
- 96 Réunion 0 kt compare
- 96 Russian Federation 0 kt compare
- 96 Rwanda 0 kt compare
- 96 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 kt compare
- 96 Saint Lucia 0 kt compare
- 96 Saint Martin 0 kt compare
- 96 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 kt compare
- 96 San Marino 0 kt compare
- 96 Sao Tome and Principe 0 kt compare
- 96 Saudi Arabia 0 kt compare
- 96 Serbia 0 kt compare
- 96 Serbia and Montenegro 0 kt compare
- 96 Singapore 0 kt compare
- 96 Sint Maarten 0 kt compare
- 96 Slovak Republic 0 kt compare
- 96 South Africa 0 kt compare
- 96 South Sudan 0 kt compare
- 96 Spain 0 kt compare
- 96 Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands 0 kt compare
- 96 Switzerland 0 kt compare
- 96 Tajikistan 0 kt compare
- 96 Tonga 0 kt compare
- 96 Turkmenistan 0 kt compare
- 96 Turks and Caicos Islands 0 kt compare
- 96 Tuvalu 0 kt compare
- 96 Ukraine 0 kt compare
- 96 United Arab Emirates 0 kt compare
- 96 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 kt compare
- 96 United States Virgin Islands 0 kt compare
- 96 Uruguay 0 kt compare
- 96 Uzbekistan 0 kt compare
- 96 Yemen 0 kt compare
More climate change data for Belarus
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 12,124 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 2,377 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 9,748 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 8.97 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 348.13 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 4,092 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 4,078 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 14.36 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 15.39 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 0.513 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) in Belarus?
- Net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) in Belarus was 0 kt in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 3,517 kt in 2011.
- What is the lowest net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 kt in 2001.
- How does Belarus rank for net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2)?
- Belarus ranks 96th out of 217 countries with data for 2025.
- Is net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 34 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).