Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) in Botswana
Botswana: Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) was 0 kt in 2025. ▬ Flat
Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) in Botswana, 1990–2025
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in kt.
Analysis
Botswana recorded 0 kt for net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) in 2025. That is the highest value across all 36 years on record.
Over the whole period, net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) in Botswana peaked at 0 kt in 1990 and was at its lowest, 0 kt, in 1990.
That places Botswana 96th out of 217 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | 6 |
Countries ranked near Botswana
- 93 Cyprus 15.53 kt compare
- 94 St. Pierre and Miquelon 1.45 kt compare
- 95 Jordan 0.502 kt compare
- 96 Afghanistan 0 kt compare
- 96 Albania 0 kt compare
- 96 American Samoa 0 kt compare
- 96 Andorra 0 kt compare
- 96 Armenia 0 kt compare
- 96 Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands 0 kt compare
- 96 Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha 0 kt compare
- 96 Azerbaijan 0 kt compare
- 96 Bahamas 0 kt compare
- 96 Bahrain 0 kt compare
- 96 Barbados 0 kt compare
- 96 Belarus 0 kt compare
- 96 Belgium 0 kt compare
- 96 Bermuda 0 kt compare
- 96 Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba 0 kt compare
- 96 British Virgin Islands 0 kt compare
- 96 Burundi 0 kt compare
- 96 Cayman Islands 0 kt compare
- 96 China (People’s Republic of) 0 kt compare
- 96 China, mainland 0 kt compare
- 96 Comoros 0 kt compare
- 96 Cuba 0 kt compare
- 96 Curaçao 0 kt compare
- 96 Czechia 0 kt compare
- 96 Denmark 0 kt compare
- 96 Djibouti 0 kt compare
- 96 Dominican Republic 0 kt compare
- 96 Egypt 0 kt compare
- 96 El Salvador 0 kt compare
- 96 Falkland Islands (Malvinas) 0 kt compare
- 96 Faroe Islands 0 kt compare
- 96 Fiji 0 kt compare
- 96 Finland 0 kt compare
- 96 France 0 kt compare
- 96 French Polynesia 0 kt compare
- 96 Georgia 0 kt compare
- 96 Germany 0 kt compare
- 96 Ghana 0 kt compare
- 96 Gibraltar 0 kt compare
- 96 Greece 0 kt compare
- 96 Greenland 0 kt compare
- 96 Grenada 0 kt compare
- 96 Guadeloupe 0 kt compare
- 96 Guam 0 kt compare
- 96 Haiti 0 kt compare
- 96 Holy See 0 kt compare
- 96 Hungary 0 kt compare
- 96 Iceland 0 kt compare
- 96 India 0 kt compare
- 96 Indonesia 0 kt compare
- 96 Ireland 0 kt compare
- 96 Isle of Man 0 kt compare
- 96 Jamaica 0 kt compare
- 96 Jersey 0 kt compare
- 96 Kazakhstan 0 kt compare
- 96 Kenya 0 kt compare
- 96 Kiribati 0 kt compare
- 96 Kuwait 0 kt compare
- 96 Kyrgyzstan 0 kt compare
- 96 Latvia 0 kt compare
- 96 Lebanon 0 kt compare
- 96 Lesotho 0 kt compare
- 96 Liechtenstein 0 kt compare
- 96 Lithuania 0 kt compare
- 96 Luxembourg 0 kt compare
- 96 Maldives 0 kt compare
- 96 Malta 0 kt compare
- 96 Marshall Islands 0 kt compare
- 96 Martinique 0 kt compare
- 96 Mauritius 0 kt compare
- 96 Monaco 0 kt compare
- 96 Mongolia 0 kt compare
- 96 Montenegro 0 kt compare
- 96 Nauru 0 kt compare
- 96 Nepal 0 kt compare
- 96 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 kt compare
- 96 New Caledonia 0 kt compare
- 96 New Zealand 0 kt compare
- 96 Norfolk Island 0 kt compare
- 96 Northern Mariana Islands 0 kt compare
- 96 Oman 0 kt compare
- 96 Pakistan 0 kt compare
- 96 Palau 0 kt compare
- 96 Palestine 0 kt compare
- 96 Philippines 0 kt compare
- 96 Pitcairn Islands 0 kt compare
- 96 Poland 0 kt compare
- 96 Portugal 0 kt compare
- 96 Qatar 0 kt compare
- 96 Réunion 0 kt compare
- 96 Russian Federation 0 kt compare
- 96 Rwanda 0 kt compare
- 96 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 kt compare
- 96 Saint Lucia 0 kt compare
- 96 Saint Martin 0 kt compare
- 96 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 kt compare
- 96 San Marino 0 kt compare
- 96 Sao Tome and Principe 0 kt compare
- 96 Saudi Arabia 0 kt compare
- 96 Serbia 0 kt compare
- 96 Serbia and Montenegro 0 kt compare
- 96 Singapore 0 kt compare
- 96 Sint Maarten, Kingdom of the Netherlands 0 kt compare
- 96 Slovak Republic 0 kt compare
- 96 South Africa 0 kt compare
- 96 South Sudan 0 kt compare
- 96 Spain 0 kt compare
- 96 Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands 0 kt compare
- 96 Switzerland 0 kt compare
- 96 Tajikistan 0 kt compare
- 96 Tonga 0 kt compare
- 96 Turkmenistan 0 kt compare
- 96 Turks and Caicos Islands 0 kt compare
- 96 Tuvalu 0 kt compare
- 96 Ukraine 0 kt compare
- 96 United Arab Emirates 0 kt compare
- 96 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 kt compare
- 96 United States Virgin Islands 0 kt compare
- 96 Uruguay 0 kt compare
- 96 Uzbekistan 0 kt compare
- 96 Yemen 0 kt compare
More climate change data for Botswana
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 5,640 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,795 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 3,846 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 6.77 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 137.34 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 17.36 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 14.07 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 3.29 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 0.0531 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 0.1176 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) in Botswana?
- Net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) in Botswana was 0 kt in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) recorded in Botswana?
- The highest recorded value was 0 kt in 1990.
- What is the lowest net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) recorded in Botswana?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 kt in 1990.
- How does Botswana rank for net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2)?
- Botswana ranks 96th out of 217 countries with data for 2025.
- Where does this Botswana data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 36 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).