Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) in Latvia
Latvia: Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) was 0 kt in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) in Latvia, 1992–2025
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in kt.
Analysis
In 2025, net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) in Latvia stood at 0 kt. That is the lowest value across all 34 years on record.
The figure is down 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) in Latvia peaked at 5,339 kt in 2016 and was at its lowest, 0 kt, in 1992.
That places Latvia 97th out of 223 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) in Latvia, year by year
| Year | kt | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 0 kt | — |
| 1993 | 0 kt | — |
| 1994 | 0 kt | — |
| 1995 | 0 kt | — |
| 1996 | 0 kt | — |
| 1997 | 0 kt | — |
| 1998 | 0 kt | — |
| 1999 | 0 kt | — |
| 2000 | 0 kt | — |
| 2001 | 0 kt | — |
| 2002 | 0 kt | — |
| 2003 | 0 kt | — |
| 2004 | 0 kt | — |
| 2005 | 0 kt | — |
| 2006 | 0 kt | — |
| 2007 | 0 kt | — |
| 2008 | 0 kt | — |
| 2009 | 0 kt | — |
| 2010 | 0 kt | — |
| 2011 | 3,867 kt | — |
| 2012 | 3,867 kt | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 3,867 kt | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 3,867 kt | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 3,867 kt | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 5,339 kt | +38.0% |
| 2017 | 5,339 kt | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 5,339 kt | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 5,339 kt | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 5,339 kt | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 0 kt | -100.0% |
| 2022 | 0 kt | — |
| 2023 | 0 kt | — |
| 2024 | 0 kt | — |
| 2025 | 0 kt | — |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | 8 |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | 10 |
| 2010s | 4,069 kt | 0 kt | 5,339 kt | 10 |
| 2020s | 889.81 kt | 0 kt | 5,339 kt | 6 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
- 94 Cyprus 15.53 kt compare
- 95 Saint Pierre and Miquelon 1.45 kt compare
- 96 Jordan 0.502 kt compare
- 97 Afghanistan 0 kt
- 97 Albania 0 kt compare
- 97 American Samoa 0 kt compare
- 97 Andorra 0 kt compare
- 97 Anguilla 0 kt
- 97 Armenia 0 kt compare
- 97 Aruba 0 kt
- 97 Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha 0 kt
- 97 Azerbaijan 0 kt compare
- 97 Bahamas 0 kt
- 97 Bahrain 0 kt
- 97 Barbados 0 kt
- 97 Belarus 0 kt compare
- 97 Belgium 0 kt compare
- 97 Bermuda 0 kt
- 97 Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba 0 kt
- 97 Botswana 0 kt
- 97 British Virgin Islands 0 kt compare
- 97 Burundi 0 kt compare
- 97 Cayman Islands 0 kt compare
- 97 China 0 kt compare
- 97 China, mainland 0 kt compare
- 97 Comoros 0 kt compare
- 97 Cook Islands 0 kt
- 97 Cuba 0 kt compare
- 97 Curaçao 0 kt
- 97 Czechia 0 kt compare
- 97 Denmark 0 kt compare
- 97 Djibouti 0 kt
- 97 Dominican Republic 0 kt compare
- 97 Egypt 0 kt
- 97 El Salvador 0 kt compare
- 97 Falkland Islands (Malvinas) 0 kt
- 97 Faroe Islands 0 kt
- 97 Fiji 0 kt
- 97 Finland 0 kt compare
- 97 France 0 kt
- 97 French Polynesia 0 kt
- 97 Georgia 0 kt
- 97 Germany 0 kt
- 97 Ghana 0 kt
- 97 Gibraltar 0 kt
- 97 Greece 0 kt
- 97 Greenland 0 kt
- 97 Grenada 0 kt
- 97 Guadeloupe 0 kt compare
- 97 Guam 0 kt
- 97 Haiti 0 kt compare
- 97 Holy See 0 kt
- 97 Hungary 0 kt compare
- 97 Iceland 0 kt
- 97 India 0 kt
- 97 Indonesia 0 kt compare
- 97 Ireland 0 kt compare
- 97 Isle of Man 0 kt
- 97 Jamaica 0 kt compare
- 97 Jersey 0 kt
- 97 Kazakhstan 0 kt compare
- 97 Kenya 0 kt compare
- 97 Kiribati 0 kt
- 97 Kuwait 0 kt
- 97 Kyrgyzstan 0 kt compare
- 97 Lebanon 0 kt
- 97 Lesotho 0 kt
- 97 Liechtenstein 0 kt
- 97 Lithuania 0 kt compare
- 97 Luxembourg 0 kt compare
- 97 Maldives 0 kt
- 97 Malta 0 kt
- 97 Marshall Islands 0 kt compare
- 97 Martinique 0 kt
- 97 Mauritius 0 kt compare
- 97 Monaco 0 kt
- 97 Mongolia 0 kt compare
- 97 Montenegro 0 kt
- 97 Montserrat 0 kt compare
- 97 Naoero 0 kt
- 97 Nepal 0 kt compare
- 97 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 kt compare
- 97 New Caledonia 0 kt compare
- 97 New Zealand 0 kt compare
- 97 Niue 0 kt compare
- 97 Norfolk Island 0 kt
- 97 Northern Mariana Islands 0 kt
- 97 Oman 0 kt
- 97 Pakistan 0 kt compare
- 97 Palau 0 kt
- 97 Palestine, State of 0 kt
- 97 Philippines 0 kt compare
- 97 Pitcairn 0 kt
- 97 Poland 0 kt
- 97 Portugal 0 kt compare
- 97 Qatar 0 kt
- 97 Réunion 0 kt
- 97 Russian Federation 0 kt compare
- 97 Rwanda 0 kt compare
- 97 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 kt
- 97 Saint Lucia 0 kt
- 97 Saint Martin (French part) 0 kt
- 97 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 kt compare
- 97 San Marino 0 kt
- 97 Sao Tome and Principe 0 kt compare
- 97 Saudi Arabia 0 kt
- 97 Serbia 0 kt
- 97 Serbia and Montenegro 0 kt
- 97 Singapore 0 kt compare
- 97 Sint Maarten 0 kt
- 97 Slovakia 0 kt compare
- 97 South Africa 0 kt
- 97 South Sudan 0 kt compare
- 97 Spain 0 kt compare
- 97 Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands 0 kt
- 97 Switzerland 0 kt compare
- 97 Tajikistan 0 kt
- 97 Tokelau 0 kt
- 97 Tonga 0 kt
- 97 Turkmenistan 0 kt
- 97 Turks and Caicos Islands 0 kt
- 97 Tuvalu 0 kt
- 97 Ukraine 0 kt compare
- 97 United Arab Emirates 0 kt
- 97 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 kt
- 97 United States Virgin Islands 0 kt compare
- 97 Uruguay 0 kt
- 97 Uzbekistan 0 kt compare
- 97 Yemen 0 kt
More climate change data for Latvia
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 1,340 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 263.83 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 1,077 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 0.9956 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 38.45 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 342.8 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 336.47 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 6.33 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 1.27 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 0.2262 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) in Latvia?
- Net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) in Latvia was 0 kt in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 5,339 kt in 2016.
- What is the lowest net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 kt in 1992.
- How does Latvia rank for net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2)?
- Latvia ranks 97th out of 223 countries with data for 2025.
- Is net forest conversion — net emissions/removals (co2) rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Net Forest conversion — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 34 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).