Belarus vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Potatoes — Crop residues

Belarus
0.0719 kt
in 2050
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
0.3011 kt
in 2050
Belarus rank
9th
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
12th

Potatoes — Crop residues over time

  • Belarus
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
00.10.20.3196120052050

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 0.3011 kt against 0.0719 kt in Belarus, a difference of 0.2292 kt.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 4.2 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 9th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 12th of 154 countries.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0856 kt 0.0916 kt 0.006 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 0.0672 kt 0.1605 kt 0.0934 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 0.0408 kt 0.1864 kt 0.1455 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 0.0267 kt 0.2052 kt 0.1785 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2030s 0.0698 kt 0.2301 kt 0.1603 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2050s 0.0719 kt 0.3011 kt 0.2292 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher potatoes — crop residues, Belarus or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 0.3011 kt against 0.0719 kt in Belarus as of 2050.
What is the difference in potatoes — crop residues between Belarus and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
0.2292 kt, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2050.
How do Belarus and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for potatoes — crop residues?
Belarus ranks 9th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 12th of 154 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potatoes — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Potatoes — Crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/belarus/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/belarus/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">Belarus vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Potatoes — Crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Potatoes — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
204 places, 11,587 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).