Syrian Arab Republic vs United Republic of Tanzania: Potatoes — Crop residues

Syrian Arab Republic
0.0075 kt
in 2050
United Republic of Tanzania
0.0188 kt
in 2050
Syrian Arab Republic rank
9th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
7th

Potatoes — Crop residues over time

  • Syrian Arab Republic
  • United Republic of Tanzania
00.0050.010.0150.02196120052050

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 0.0188 kt against 0.0075 kt in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 0.0113 kt.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 2.5 times Syrian Arab Republic's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Syrian Arab Republic ranks 9th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 18 countries.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Syrian Arab Republic United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0004 kt 0.0006 kt 0.0001 kt United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 0.0012 kt 0.0025 kt 0.0013 kt United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 0.0027 kt 0.0059 kt 0.0032 kt United Republic of Tanzania
1990s 0.0031 kt 0.0072 kt 0.0041 kt United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 0.0041 kt 0.0109 kt 0.0068 kt United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 0.0041 kt 0.0168 kt 0.0126 kt United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 0.0041 kt 0.0126 kt 0.0084 kt United Republic of Tanzania
2030s 0.0062 kt 0.012 kt 0.0058 kt United Republic of Tanzania
2050s 0.0075 kt 0.0188 kt 0.0113 kt United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher potatoes — crop residues, Syrian Arab Republic or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 0.0188 kt against 0.0075 kt in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2050.
What is the difference in potatoes — crop residues between Syrian Arab Republic and United Republic of Tanzania?
0.0113 kt, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Syrian Arab Republic and United Republic of Tanzania?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Syrian Arab Republic and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for potatoes — crop residues?
Syrian Arab Republic ranks 9th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 18 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potatoes — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Syrian Arab Republic vs United Republic of Tanzania: Potatoes — Crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/syrian-arab-republic-2/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/potatoes-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/syrian-arab-republic-2/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Syrian Arab Republic vs United Republic of Tanzania: Potatoes — Crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Potatoes — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
204 places, 11,587 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).