El Salvador vs Kyrgyzstan: Rice — Burning crop residues
Rice — Burning crop residues over time
- El Salvador
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 3,887 t against 3,294 t in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 593 t.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.2 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 86th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 88th of 134 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 2 and Kyrgyzstan in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7,127 t | 2,406 t | 4,721 t | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 2,690 t | 3,372 t | 682.22 t | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 2,670 t | 4,819 t | 2,149 t | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 1,340 t | 6,566 t | 5,226 t | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2030s | 2,960 t | 3,523 t | 562.66 t | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2050s | 3,887 t | 3,294 t | 593.39 t | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rice — burning crop residues, El Salvador or Kyrgyzstan?
- El Salvador, at 3,887 t against 3,294 t in Kyrgyzstan as of 2050.
- What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues between El Salvador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 593 t, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2050.
- How do El Salvador and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for rice — burning crop residues?
- El Salvador ranks 86th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 88th of 134 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).