El Salvador vs Yugoslav SFR: Rice — Crop residues
Rice — Crop residues over time
- El Salvador
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 0.0091 kt against 0.0072 kt in Yugoslav SFR, a difference of 0.0019 kt.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.3 times Yugoslav SFR's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1961 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 81st and Yugoslav SFR ranks 83rd of 115 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0098 kt | 0.0045 kt | 0.0054 kt | El Salvador |
| 1970s | 0.0093 kt | 0.0063 kt | 0.003 kt | El Salvador |
| 1980s | 0.0107 kt | 0.0075 kt | 0.0032 kt | El Salvador |
| 1990s | 0.0121 kt | 0.0066 kt | 0.0055 kt | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rice — crop residues, El Salvador or Yugoslav SFR?
- El Salvador, at 0.0091 kt against 0.0072 kt in Yugoslav SFR as of 2050.
- What is the difference in rice — crop residues between El Salvador and Yugoslav SFR?
- 0.0019 kt, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do El Salvador and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for rice — crop residues?
- El Salvador ranks 81st and Yugoslav SFR ranks 83rd of 115 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).