Ecuador vs Montenegro: Rye — Crop residues
Rye — Crop residues over time
- Ecuador
- Montenegro
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 2,925 kg against 2,451 kg in Montenegro, a difference of 474 kg.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.2 times Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Ecuador ranks 59th and Montenegro ranks 60th of 66 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,559 kg | 2,446 kg | 886.46 kg | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 1,576 kg | 4,726 kg | 3,150 kg | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 1,512 kg | 3,988 kg | 2,476 kg | Montenegro |
| 2030s | 2,317 kg | 2,584 kg | 267.29 kg | Montenegro |
| 2050s | 2,925 kg | 2,451 kg | 474.63 kg | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rye — crop residues, Ecuador or Montenegro?
- Ecuador, at 2,925 kg against 2,451 kg in Montenegro as of 2050.
- What is the difference in rye — crop residues between Ecuador and Montenegro?
- 474 kg, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Montenegro?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2050.
- How do Ecuador and Montenegro rank globally for rye — crop residues?
- Ecuador ranks 59th and Montenegro ranks 60th of 66 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rye — Crop residues (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).