Mayotte vs Seychelles: Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food

Mayotte
0.0%
in 2015
Seychelles
0.0%
in 2015
Mayotte rank
191st
Seychelles rank
189th

Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food over time

  • Mayotte
  • Seychelles
0000.0010.001199020022015

How they compare

Seychelles currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Mayotte, a difference of 0.0%.

That makes Seychelles's figure about 1.5 times Mayotte's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mayotte ahead.

Mayotte ranks 191st and Seychelles ranks 189th of 217 regions.

Seychelles has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mayotte Seychelles Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Seychelles
2000s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Seychelles
2010s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Seychelles

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food, Mayotte or Seychelles?
Seychelles, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Mayotte as of 2015.
What is the difference in share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food between Mayotte and Seychelles?
0.0%, with Seychelles ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mayotte and Seychelles?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Mayotte and Seychelles rank globally for share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food?
Mayotte ranks 191st and Seychelles ranks 189th of 217 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food
Unit
%
Source
Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
217 places, 5,642 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.