Bangladesh vs Costa Rica: Sorghum — Crop residues
Sorghum — Crop residues over time
- Bangladesh
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Costa Rica, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.
Bangladesh ranks 92nd and Costa Rica ranks 92nd of 112 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0004 kt | 0.0003 kt | Costa Rica |
| 1970s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0011 kt | 0.001 kt | Costa Rica |
| 1980s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0012 kt | 0.0011 kt | Costa Rica |
| 1990s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sorghum — crop residues, Bangladesh or Costa Rica?
- Bangladesh, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Costa Rica as of 2050.
- What is the difference in sorghum — crop residues between Bangladesh and Costa Rica?
- 0 kt, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Costa Rica?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Bangladesh and Costa Rica rank globally for sorghum — crop residues?
- Bangladesh ranks 92nd and Costa Rica ranks 92nd of 112 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sorghum — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).