El Salvador vs Zimbabwe: Sorghum — Crop residues

El Salvador
0.0125 kt
in 2050
Zimbabwe
0.0154 kt
in 2050
El Salvador rank
36th
Zimbabwe rank
33rd

Sorghum — Crop residues over time

  • El Salvador
  • Zimbabwe
0.0050.010.0150.02196120052050

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0154 kt against 0.0125 kt in El Salvador, a difference of 0.0029 kt.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times El Salvador's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

El Salvador ranks 36th and Zimbabwe ranks 33rd of 112 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 8.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0063 kt 0.0075 kt 0.0012 kt Zimbabwe
1970s 0.0085 kt 0.0094 kt 0.0009 kt Zimbabwe
1980s 0.0074 kt 0.0094 kt 0.002 kt Zimbabwe
1990s 0.009 kt 0.0066 kt 0.0024 kt El Salvador
2000s 0.0069 kt 0.0089 kt 0.002 kt Zimbabwe
2010s 0.0062 kt 0.0087 kt 0.0025 kt Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0047 kt 0.0118 kt 0.007 kt Zimbabwe
2030s 0.0108 kt 0.0132 kt 0.0024 kt Zimbabwe
2050s 0.0125 kt 0.0154 kt 0.0029 kt Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sorghum — crop residues, El Salvador or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.0154 kt against 0.0125 kt in El Salvador as of 2050.
What is the difference in sorghum — crop residues between El Salvador and Zimbabwe?
0.0029 kt, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Zimbabwe?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do El Salvador and Zimbabwe rank globally for sorghum — crop residues?
El Salvador ranks 36th and Zimbabwe ranks 33rd of 112 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sorghum — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Zimbabwe: Sorghum — Crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sorghum-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/el-salvador/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sorghum-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/el-salvador/zimbabwe/">El Salvador vs Zimbabwe: Sorghum — Crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sorghum — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
158 places, 8,807 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).