Australia and New Zealand vs Rwanda: Soya beans — Crop residues

Australia and New Zealand
0.0262 kt
in 2050
Rwanda
0.0261 kt
in 2050
Australia and New Zealand rank
36th
Rwanda rank
38th

Soya beans — Crop residues over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Rwanda
00.010.020.03196120052050

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 0.0262 kt against 0.0261 kt in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0001 kt.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 36th and Rwanda ranks 38th of 98 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 7 and Rwanda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0003 kt 0.0001 kt 0.0001 kt Australia and New Zealand
1970s 0.0126 kt 0.0009 kt 0.0117 kt Australia and New Zealand
1980s 0.022 kt 0.0024 kt 0.0195 kt Australia and New Zealand
1990s 0.0152 kt 0.0052 kt 0.0101 kt Australia and New Zealand
2000s 0.0122 kt 0.0117 kt 0.0005 kt Australia and New Zealand
2010s 0.0108 kt 0.0125 kt 0.0017 kt Rwanda
2020s 0.0094 kt 0.015 kt 0.0056 kt Rwanda
2030s 0.0212 kt 0.0178 kt 0.0034 kt Australia and New Zealand
2050s 0.0262 kt 0.0261 kt 0.0001 kt Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher soya beans — crop residues, Australia and New Zealand or Rwanda?
Australia and New Zealand, at 0.0262 kt against 0.0261 kt in Rwanda as of 2050.
What is the difference in soya beans — crop residues between Australia and New Zealand and Rwanda?
0.0001 kt, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Rwanda?
60 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Rwanda rank globally for soya beans — crop residues?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 36th and Rwanda ranks 38th of 98 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Soya beans — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Rwanda: Soya beans — Crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/soya-beans-crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/soya-beans-crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/rwanda/">Australia and New Zealand vs Rwanda: Soya beans — Crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Soya beans — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 7,252 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).