Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Uruguay: Soya beans — Crop residues (Emissions N2O)

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
4.22 kt
in 2050
Uruguay
0.4362 kt
in 2050
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
11th
Uruguay rank
12th

Soya beans — Crop residues (Emissions N2O) over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Uruguay
01234196120052050

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 4.22 kt against 0.4362 kt in Uruguay, a difference of 3.78 kt.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 9.7 times Uruguay's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 11th and Uruguay ranks 12th of 31 groups.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0093 kt 0.0004 kt 0.0089 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1970s 0.0952 kt 0.0051 kt 0.0901 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1980s 0.3882 kt 0.0128 kt 0.3755 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1990s 0.8225 kt 0.0056 kt 0.817 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 1.73 kt 0.1289 kt 1.6 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 3.24 kt 0.6435 kt 2.6 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 3.86 kt 0.5154 kt 3.34 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2030s 3.4 kt 0.4133 kt 2.98 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2050s 4.22 kt 0.4362 kt 3.78 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher soya beans — crop residues, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Uruguay?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 4.22 kt against 0.4362 kt in Uruguay as of 2050.
What is the difference in soya beans — crop residues between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Uruguay?
3.78 kt, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Uruguay?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Uruguay rank globally for soya beans — crop residues?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 11th and Uruguay ranks 12th of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Soya beans — Crop residues (Emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Uruguay: Soya beans — Crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/soya-beans-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/soya-beans-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/uruguay/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Uruguay: Soya beans — Crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Soya beans — Crop residues (Emissions N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 7,252 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).