Japan vs Serbia and Montenegro: Soya beans — Crop residues
Soya beans — Crop residues over time
- Japan
- Serbia and Montenegro
How they compare
Serbia and Montenegro currently reports 0.0168 kt against 0.0121 kt in Japan, a difference of 0.0047 kt.
That makes Serbia and Montenegro's figure about 1.4 times Japan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 25th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 22nd of 98 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Serbia and Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0081 kt | 0.0072 kt | 0.0009 kt | Japan |
| 2000s | 0.0131 kt | 0.0128 kt | 0.0003 kt | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher soya beans — crop residues, Japan or Serbia and Montenegro?
- Serbia and Montenegro, at 0.0168 kt against 0.0121 kt in Japan as of 2005.
- What is the difference in soya beans — crop residues between Japan and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 0.0047 kt, with Serbia and Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2005.
- How do Japan and Serbia and Montenegro rank globally for soya beans — crop residues?
- Japan ranks 25th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 22nd of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Soya beans — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).