Bahamas vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues

Bahamas
0.0001 kt
in 2050
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.0001 kt
in 2050
Bahamas rank
82nd
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
82nd

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues over time

  • Bahamas
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
00000196120052050

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports 0.0001 kt against 0.0001 kt in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0 kt.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Bahamas ranks 82nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 82nd of 103 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt 0.0002 kt 0.0002 kt Saint Kitts and Nevis
1970s 0.0001 kt 0.0002 kt 0.0001 kt Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 0.0001 kt 0.0002 kt 0.0001 kt Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 0.0001 kt 0.0002 kt 0.0001 kt Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 0.0001 kt 0.0002 kt 0.0001 kt Saint Kitts and Nevis
2030s 0.0001 kt 0.0001 kt 0 kt
2050s 0.0001 kt 0.0001 kt 0 kt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues, Bahamas or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Bahamas, at 0.0001 kt against 0.0001 kt in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2050.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues between Bahamas and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0 kt, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
43 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2050.
How do Bahamas and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues?
Bahamas ranks 82nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 82nd of 103 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/bahamas-the/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/bahamas-the/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Bahamas vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
146 places, 8,867 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).