Annual co2 including land use in Argentina
Argentina: Annual co2 including land use was 315.46 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
315.46 million
Change on year
down 2.5%
World rank
21st
of 194 countries
All-time high
515.96 million
in 2009
All-time low
6.98 million
in 1949
Years of data
169
1856–2024
Annual co2 including land use in Argentina, 1856–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for annual co2 including land use in Argentina is 315.46 million, measured in 2024.
The figure is down 2.5% on the previous year and down 13.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, annual co2 including land use in Argentina peaked at 515.96 million in 2009 and was at its lowest, 6.98 million, in 1949.
Argentina ranks 21st of 194 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Annual co2 including land use in Argentina, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1856 | 11.73 million | — |
| 1857 | 11.84 million | +0.9% |
| 1858 | 12.05 million | +1.8% |
| 1859 | 12.23 million | +1.5% |
| 1860 | 12.86 million | +5.2% |
| 1861 | 13.40 million | +4.2% |
| 1862 | 13.76 million | +2.7% |
| 1863 | 14.09 million | +2.5% |
| 1864 | 14.29 million | +1.4% |
| 1865 | 14.38 million | +0.6% |
| 1866 | 14.69 million | +2.1% |
| 1867 | 14.82 million | +0.9% |
| 1868 | 14.96 million | +0.9% |
| 1869 | 15.06 million | +0.6% |
| 1870 | 15.97 million | +6.1% |
| 1871 | 16.68 million | +4.5% |
| 1872 | 17.04 million | +2.1% |
| 1873 | 17.22 million | +1.1% |
| 1874 | 17.63 million | +2.4% |
| 1875 | 17.64 million | +0.1% |
| 1876 | 17.87 million | +1.3% |
| 1877 | 18.01 million | +0.8% |
| 1878 | 18.28 million | +1.5% |
| 1879 | 18.39 million | +0.6% |
| 1880 | 18.60 million | +1.1% |
| 1881 | 19.11 million | +2.7% |
| 1882 | 19.52 million | +2.1% |
| 1883 | 19.71 million | +1.0% |
| 1884 | 20.03 million | +1.6% |
| 1885 | 20.15 million | +0.6% |
| 1886 | 20.44 million | +1.4% |
| 1887 | 21.15 million | +3.5% |
| 1888 | 20.98 million | -0.8% |
| 1889 | 22.04 million | +5.0% |
| 1890 | 23.20 million | +5.3% |
| 1891 | 24.20 million | +4.3% |
| 1892 | 25.71 million | +6.2% |
| 1893 | 26.55 million | +3.3% |
| 1894 | 27.78 million | +4.6% |
| 1895 | 28.55 million | +2.8% |
| 1896 | 29.05 million | +1.8% |
| 1897 | 29.25 million | +0.7% |
| 1898 | 29.92 million | +2.3% |
| 1899 | 30.55 million | +2.1% |
| 1900 | 60.20 million | +97.1% |
| 1901 | 79.40 million | +31.9% |
| 1902 | 91.01 million | +14.6% |
| 1903 | 99.80 million | +9.7% |
| 1904 | 106.87 million | +7.1% |
| 1905 | 112.53 million | +5.3% |
| 1906 | 116.63 million | +3.6% |
| 1907 | 120.31 million | +3.2% |
| 1908 | 124.02 million | +3.1% |
| 1909 | 124.76 million | +0.6% |
| 1910 | 138.41 million | +10.9% |
| 1911 | 146.80 million | +6.1% |
| 1912 | 151.98 million | +3.5% |
| 1913 | 158.11 million | +4.0% |
| 1914 | 158.19 million | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 160.31 million | +1.3% |
| 1916 | 158.93 million | -0.9% |
| 1917 | 161.11 million | +1.4% |
| 1918 | 160.91 million | -0.1% |
| 1919 | 165.19 million | +2.7% |
| 1920 | 185.82 million | +12.5% |
| 1921 | 199.36 million | +7.3% |
| 1922 | 207.45 million | +4.1% |
| 1923 | 213.83 million | +3.1% |
| 1924 | 220.80 million | +3.3% |
| 1925 | 225.28 million | +2.0% |
| 1926 | 226.68 million | +0.6% |
| 1927 | 231.83 million | +2.3% |
| 1928 | 233.56 million | +0.7% |
| 1929 | 234.86 million | +0.6% |
| 1930 | 188.70 million | -19.7% |
| 1931 | 158.08 million | -16.2% |
| 1932 | 141.62 million | -10.4% |
| 1933 | 130.50 million | -7.9% |
| 1934 | 123.45 million | -5.4% |
| 1935 | 116.60 million | -5.5% |
| 1936 | 112.22 million | -3.8% |
| 1937 | 108.95 million | -2.9% |
| 1938 | 105.74 million | -2.9% |
| 1939 | 102.81 million | -2.8% |
| 1940 | 76.25 million | -25.8% |
| 1941 | 58.77 million | -22.9% |
| 1942 | 46.79 million | -20.4% |
| 1943 | 38.32 million | -18.1% |
| 1944 | 30.70 million | -19.9% |
| 1945 | 24.06 million | -21.6% |
| 1946 | 18.56 million | -22.9% |
| 1947 | 14.53 million | -21.7% |
| 1948 | 13.11 million | -9.8% |
| 1949 | 6.98 million | -46.8% |
| 1950 | 41.15 million | +489.8% |
| 1951 | 56.45 million | +37.2% |
| 1952 | 65.18 million | +15.5% |
| 1953 | 69.14 million | +6.1% |
| 1954 | 74.62 million | +7.9% |
| 1955 | 80.56 million | +8.0% |
| 1956 | 88.15 million | +9.4% |
| 1957 | 93.40 million | +6.0% |
| 1958 | 91.68 million | -1.8% |
| 1959 | 99.12 million | +8.1% |
| 1960 | 81.54 million | -17.7% |
| 1961 | 115.61 million | +41.8% |
| 1962 | 121.99 million | +5.5% |
| 1963 | 120.29 million | -1.4% |
| 1964 | 132.74 million | +10.3% |
| 1965 | 189.44 million | +42.7% |
| 1966 | 192.44 million | +1.6% |
| 1967 | 253.09 million | +31.5% |
| 1968 | 195.55 million | -22.7% |
| 1969 | 172.04 million | -12.0% |
| 1970 | 161.23 million | -6.3% |
| 1971 | 157.85 million | -2.1% |
| 1972 | 153.44 million | -2.8% |
| 1973 | 153.66 million | +0.1% |
| 1974 | 152.23 million | -0.9% |
| 1975 | 149.12 million | -2.0% |
| 1976 | 151.67 million | +1.7% |
| 1977 | 151.48 million | -0.1% |
| 1978 | 151.24 million | -0.2% |
| 1979 | 158.72 million | +4.9% |
| 1980 | 156.64 million | -1.3% |
| 1981 | 147.86 million | -5.6% |
| 1982 | 148.77 million | +0.6% |
| 1983 | 150.72 million | +1.3% |
| 1984 | 151.32 million | +0.4% |
| 1985 | 145.09 million | -4.1% |
| 1986 | 148.16 million | +2.1% |
| 1987 | 158.48 million | +7.0% |
| 1988 | 162.99 million | +2.8% |
| 1989 | 158.19 million | -2.9% |
| 1990 | 153.09 million | -3.2% |
| 1991 | 202.37 million | +32.2% |
| 1992 | 177.64 million | -12.2% |
| 1993 | 163.41 million | -8.0% |
| 1994 | 163.01 million | -0.2% |
| 1995 | 170.70 million | +4.7% |
| 1996 | 177.66 million | +4.1% |
| 1997 | 187.91 million | +5.8% |
| 1998 | 197.51 million | +5.1% |
| 1999 | 202.29 million | +2.4% |
| 2000 | 197.93 million | -2.2% |
| 2001 | 186.68 million | -5.7% |
| 2002 | 310.17 million | +66.2% |
| 2003 | 385.69 million | +24.3% |
| 2004 | 452.83 million | +17.4% |
| 2005 | 472.51 million | +4.3% |
| 2006 | 478.37 million | +1.2% |
| 2007 | 336.01 million | -29.8% |
| 2008 | 277.95 million | -17.3% |
| 2009 | 515.96 million | +85.6% |
| 2010 | 430.32 million | -16.6% |
| 2011 | 422.91 million | -1.7% |
| 2012 | 342.98 million | -18.9% |
| 2013 | 292.85 million | -14.6% |
| 2014 | 366.31 million | +25.1% |
| 2015 | 303.18 million | -17.2% |
| 2016 | 297.88 million | -1.7% |
| 2017 | 267.75 million | -10.1% |
| 2018 | 295.87 million | +10.5% |
| 2019 | 342.21 million | +15.7% |
| 2020 | 293.66 million | -14.2% |
| 2021 | 348.08 million | +18.5% |
| 2022 | 333.00 million | -4.3% |
| 2023 | 323.70 million | -2.8% |
| 2024 | 315.46 million | -2.5% |
Argentina compared with similar countries
- Argentina's 315.46 million is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 24.44 million, 12.9× the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Argentina's 315.46 million is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 14.67 million, 21.5× the median. (33 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Annual co2 including land use in Argentina changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950 | +489.8% | 6.98 million | 41.15 million |
| 1900 | +97.1% | 30.55 million | 60.20 million |
| 2009 | +85.6% | 277.95 million | 515.96 million |
| 2002 | +66.2% | 186.68 million | 310.17 million |
| 1949 | -46.8% | 13.11 million | 6.98 million |
| 1965 | +42.7% | 132.74 million | 189.44 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 11.96 million | 11.73 million | 12.23 million | 4 |
| 1860s | 14.23 million | 12.86 million | 15.06 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 17.47 million | 15.97 million | 18.39 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 20.17 million | 18.60 million | 22.04 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 27.48 million | 23.20 million | 30.55 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 103.55 million | 60.20 million | 124.76 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 155.99 million | 138.41 million | 165.19 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 217.95 million | 185.82 million | 234.86 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 128.87 million | 102.81 million | 188.70 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 32.81 million | 6.98 million | 76.25 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 75.95 million | 41.15 million | 99.12 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 157.47 million | 81.54 million | 253.09 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 154.06 million | 149.12 million | 161.23 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 152.82 million | 145.09 million | 162.99 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 179.56 million | 153.09 million | 202.37 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 361.41 million | 186.68 million | 515.96 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 336.22 million | 267.75 million | 430.32 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 322.78 million | 293.66 million | 348.08 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Argentina
More climate change data for Argentina
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 1.78 billion kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 145,843 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 31,455 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 114,387 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 118.7 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 4,085 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 21,692 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 18,286 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 3,406 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 69 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is annual co2 including land use in Argentina?
- Annual co2 including land use in Argentina was 315.46 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest annual co2 including land use recorded in Argentina?
- The highest recorded value was 515.96 million in 2009.
- What is the lowest annual co2 including land use recorded in Argentina?
- The lowest recorded value was 6.98 million in 1949.
- How does Argentina rank for annual co2 including land use?
- Argentina ranks 21st out of 194 countries with data for 2024.
- Is annual co2 including land use rising or falling in Argentina?
- Over the last ten years it is down 13.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Argentina data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Annual co2 including land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 169 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).