Annual co2 including land use in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Annual co2 including land use was 279.20 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
279.20 million
Change on year
up 0.4%
World rank
24th
of 194 countries
All-time high
326.96 million
in 1959
All-time low
-19.09 million
in 1939
Years of data
169
1850–2024
Annual co2 including land use in Kazakhstan, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for annual co2 including land use in Kazakhstan is 279.20 million, measured in 2024.
The figure is up 0.4% on the previous year and down 5.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, annual co2 including land use in Kazakhstan peaked at 326.96 million in 1959 and was at its lowest, -19.09 million, in 1939.
Kazakhstan ranks 24th of 194 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Annual co2 including land use in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 20.75 million | — |
| 1855 | 21.24 million | +2.4% |
| 1858 | 21.37 million | +0.6% |
| 1859 | 21.38 million | +0.1% |
| 1860 | 21.42 million | +0.2% |
| 1861 | 21.68 million | +1.2% |
| 1862 | 21.78 million | +0.5% |
| 1863 | 21.88 million | +0.4% |
| 1864 | 22.03 million | +0.7% |
| 1865 | 22.11 million | +0.4% |
| 1866 | 22.21 million | +0.4% |
| 1867 | 22.29 million | +0.4% |
| 1868 | 22.34 million | +0.2% |
| 1869 | 22.37 million | +0.1% |
| 1870 | 22.76 million | +1.8% |
| 1871 | 22.92 million | +0.7% |
| 1872 | 23.05 million | +0.5% |
| 1873 | 23.17 million | +0.5% |
| 1874 | 23.35 million | +0.8% |
| 1875 | 23.50 million | +0.6% |
| 1876 | 23.68 million | +0.8% |
| 1877 | 23.78 million | +0.4% |
| 1878 | 24.03 million | +1.0% |
| 1879 | 24.07 million | +0.2% |
| 1880 | 24.44 million | +1.5% |
| 1881 | 24.65 million | +0.9% |
| 1882 | 24.84 million | +0.8% |
| 1883 | 25.00 million | +0.7% |
| 1884 | 25.11 million | +0.4% |
| 1885 | 25.28 million | +0.7% |
| 1886 | 25.33 million | +0.2% |
| 1887 | 25.37 million | +0.1% |
| 1888 | 25.54 million | +0.7% |
| 1889 | 25.74 million | +0.8% |
| 1890 | 26.04 million | +1.2% |
| 1891 | 26.46 million | +1.6% |
| 1892 | 26.73 million | +1.0% |
| 1893 | 27.20 million | +1.8% |
| 1894 | 27.45 million | +0.9% |
| 1895 | 27.93 million | +1.7% |
| 1896 | 28.13 million | +0.7% |
| 1897 | 28.69 million | +2.0% |
| 1898 | 29.15 million | +1.6% |
| 1899 | 29.84 million | +2.4% |
| 1900 | 31.17 million | +4.4% |
| 1901 | 31.62 million | +1.4% |
| 1902 | 31.64 million | +0.1% |
| 1903 | 31.75 million | +0.4% |
| 1904 | 32.53 million | +2.5% |
| 1905 | 32.12 million | -1.3% |
| 1906 | 33.00 million | +2.7% |
| 1907 | 33.78 million | +2.4% |
| 1908 | 34.03 million | +0.7% |
| 1909 | 34.52 million | +1.5% |
| 1910 | 33.30 million | -3.5% |
| 1911 | 33.23 million | -0.2% |
| 1912 | 33.75 million | +1.6% |
| 1913 | 34.17 million | +1.3% |
| 1914 | 33.19 million | -2.9% |
| 1915 | 32.43 million | -2.3% |
| 1916 | 32.68 million | +0.8% |
| 1917 | 31.91 million | -2.4% |
| 1918 | 27.80 million | -12.9% |
| 1919 | 27.26 million | -1.9% |
| 1920 | 27.97 million | +2.6% |
| 1921 | 28.56 million | +2.1% |
| 1922 | 29.24 million | +2.4% |
| 1923 | 29.71 million | +1.6% |
| 1924 | 30.56 million | +2.9% |
| 1925 | 30.51 million | -0.2% |
| 1926 | 32.18 million | +5.5% |
| 1927 | 33.44 million | +3.9% |
| 1928 | 34.28 million | +2.5% |
| 1929 | 34.81 million | +1.5% |
| 1930 | 24.68 million | -29.1% |
| 1931 | 16.52 million | -33.1% |
| 1932 | 9.35 million | -43.4% |
| 1933 | 3.16 million | -66.2% |
| 1934 | -377,234 | -111.9% |
| 1935 | -4.24 million | +1023.4% |
| 1936 | -6.80 million | +60.5% |
| 1937 | -11.50 million | +69.0% |
| 1938 | -14.92 million | +29.8% |
| 1939 | -19.09 million | +28.0% |
| 1940 | 14.82 million | -177.6% |
| 1941 | 29.90 million | +101.7% |
| 1942 | 31.64 million | +5.8% |
| 1943 | 44.56 million | +40.9% |
| 1944 | 62.35 million | +39.9% |
| 1945 | 72.83 million | +16.8% |
| 1946 | 83.89 million | +15.2% |
| 1947 | 96.67 million | +15.2% |
| 1948 | 105.17 million | +8.8% |
| 1949 | 115.75 million | +10.1% |
| 1950 | 145.86 million | +26.0% |
| 1951 | 168.97 million | +15.8% |
| 1952 | 188.96 million | +11.8% |
| 1953 | 207.84 million | +10.0% |
| 1954 | 227.45 million | +9.4% |
| 1955 | 249.90 million | +9.9% |
| 1956 | 269.73 million | +7.9% |
| 1957 | 290.58 million | +7.7% |
| 1958 | 308.90 million | +6.3% |
| 1959 | 326.96 million | +5.8% |
| 1960 | 283.34 million | -13.3% |
| 1961 | 264.48 million | -6.7% |
| 1962 | 240.08 million | -9.2% |
| 1963 | 225.76 million | -6.0% |
| 1964 | 217.20 million | -3.8% |
| 1965 | 205.50 million | -5.4% |
| 1966 | 202.79 million | -1.3% |
| 1967 | 199.59 million | -1.6% |
| 1968 | 198.88 million | -0.4% |
| 1969 | 196.80 million | -1.0% |
| 1970 | 200.50 million | +1.9% |
| 1971 | 204.30 million | +1.9% |
| 1972 | 207.44 million | +1.5% |
| 1973 | 215.33 million | +3.8% |
| 1974 | 215.57 million | +0.1% |
| 1975 | 222.76 million | +3.3% |
| 1976 | 227.94 million | +2.3% |
| 1977 | 230.08 million | +0.9% |
| 1978 | 233.16 million | +1.3% |
| 1979 | 234.33 million | +0.5% |
| 1980 | 244.39 million | +4.3% |
| 1981 | 237.97 million | -2.6% |
| 1982 | 241.27 million | +1.4% |
| 1983 | 241.71 million | +0.2% |
| 1984 | 243.43 million | +0.7% |
| 1985 | 261.34 million | +7.4% |
| 1986 | 265.95 million | +1.8% |
| 1987 | 261.27 million | -1.8% |
| 1988 | 272.94 million | +4.5% |
| 1989 | 260.88 million | -4.4% |
| 1990 | 264.36 million | +1.3% |
| 1991 | 261.99 million | -0.9% |
| 1992 | 232.76 million | -11.2% |
| 1993 | 197.53 million | -15.1% |
| 1994 | 168.87 million | -14.5% |
| 1995 | 120.82 million | -28.5% |
| 1996 | 109.83 million | -9.1% |
| 1997 | 100.58 million | -8.4% |
| 1998 | 108.83 million | +8.2% |
| 1999 | 43.51 million | -60.0% |
| 2000 | 60.69 million | +39.5% |
| 2001 | 44.33 million | -27.0% |
| 2002 | 76.56 million | +72.7% |
| 2003 | 109.22 million | +42.7% |
| 2004 | 127.45 million | +16.7% |
| 2005 | 146.31 million | +14.8% |
| 2006 | 171.44 million | +17.2% |
| 2007 | 177.41 million | +3.5% |
| 2008 | 186.03 million | +4.9% |
| 2009 | 187.29 million | +0.7% |
| 2010 | 236.55 million | +26.3% |
| 2011 | 225.94 million | -4.5% |
| 2012 | 231.59 million | +2.5% |
| 2013 | 237.14 million | +2.4% |
| 2014 | 295.42 million | +24.6% |
| 2015 | 290.84 million | -1.5% |
| 2016 | 288.94 million | -0.7% |
| 2017 | 307.52 million | +6.4% |
| 2018 | 313.61 million | +2.0% |
| 2019 | 287.74 million | -8.2% |
| 2020 | 275.78 million | -4.2% |
| 2021 | 235.83 million | -14.5% |
| 2022 | 265.75 million | +12.7% |
| 2023 | 277.96 million | +4.6% |
| 2024 | 279.20 million | +0.4% |
Kazakhstan compared with similar countries
- Kazakhstan's 279.20 million is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 24.44 million, 11.4× the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Kazakhstan's 279.20 million is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 32.46 million, 8.6× the median. (50 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Annual co2 including land use in Kazakhstan changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1935 | -1023.4% | -377,234 | -4.24 million |
| 1940 | +177.6% | -19.09 million | 14.82 million |
| 1934 | -111.9% | 3.16 million | -377,234 |
| 1941 | +101.7% | 14.82 million | 29.90 million |
| 2002 | +72.7% | 44.33 million | 76.56 million |
| 1937 | -69.0% | -6.80 million | -11.50 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 21.19 million | 20.75 million | 21.38 million | 4 |
| 1860s | 22.01 million | 21.42 million | 22.37 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 23.43 million | 22.76 million | 24.07 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 25.13 million | 24.44 million | 25.74 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 27.76 million | 26.04 million | 29.84 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 32.62 million | 31.17 million | 34.52 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 31.97 million | 27.26 million | 34.17 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 31.13 million | 27.97 million | 34.81 million | 10 |
| 1930s | -322,011 | -19.09 million | 24.68 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 65.76 million | 14.82 million | 115.75 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 238.52 million | 145.86 million | 326.96 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 223.44 million | 196.80 million | 283.34 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 219.14 million | 200.50 million | 234.33 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 253.11 million | 237.97 million | 272.94 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 160.91 million | 43.51 million | 264.36 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 128.67 million | 44.33 million | 187.29 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 271.53 million | 225.94 million | 313.61 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 266.90 million | 235.83 million | 279.20 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
More climate change data for Kazakhstan
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 52.07 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 21,403 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 5,230 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 16,173 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 19.73 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 577.6 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,395 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,596 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 798.63 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 6.02 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is annual co2 including land use in Kazakhstan?
- Annual co2 including land use in Kazakhstan was 279.20 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest annual co2 including land use recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 326.96 million in 1959.
- What is the lowest annual co2 including land use recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was -19.09 million in 1939.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for annual co2 including land use?
- Kazakhstan ranks 24th out of 194 countries with data for 2024.
- Is annual co2 including land use rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 5.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Annual co2 including land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 169 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).