Annual co2 including land use in Canada
Canada: Annual co2 including land use was 645.29 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
645.29 million
Change on year
down 3.2%
World rank
11th
of 194 countries
All-time high
833.32 million
in 2000
All-time low
70.27 million
in 1850
Years of data
175
1850–2024
Annual co2 including land use in Canada, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2024, annual co2 including land use in Canada stood at 645.29 million.
The figure is down 3.2% on the previous year and down 10.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, annual co2 including land use in Canada peaked at 833.32 million in 2000 and was at its lowest, 70.27 million, in 1850.
That places Canada 11th out of 194 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Annual co2 including land use in Canada, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 70.27 million | — |
| 1851 | 75.32 million | +7.2% |
| 1852 | 79.10 million | +5.0% |
| 1853 | 81.13 million | +2.6% |
| 1854 | 85.54 million | +5.4% |
| 1855 | 91.39 million | +6.9% |
| 1856 | 90.33 million | -1.2% |
| 1857 | 92.67 million | +2.6% |
| 1858 | 95.28 million | +2.8% |
| 1859 | 98.66 million | +3.5% |
| 1860 | 108.69 million | +10.2% |
| 1861 | 112.69 million | +3.7% |
| 1862 | 115.46 million | +2.5% |
| 1863 | 118.20 million | +2.4% |
| 1864 | 122.61 million | +3.7% |
| 1865 | 124.24 million | +1.3% |
| 1866 | 125.30 million | +0.9% |
| 1867 | 128.20 million | +2.3% |
| 1868 | 129.38 million | +0.9% |
| 1869 | 133.47 million | +3.2% |
| 1870 | 124.87 million | -6.4% |
| 1871 | 124.79 million | -0.1% |
| 1872 | 125.25 million | +0.4% |
| 1873 | 122.54 million | -2.2% |
| 1874 | 121.15 million | -1.1% |
| 1875 | 123.16 million | +1.7% |
| 1876 | 124.62 million | +1.2% |
| 1877 | 126.26 million | +1.3% |
| 1878 | 127.21 million | +0.7% |
| 1879 | 128.62 million | +1.1% |
| 1880 | 135.13 million | +5.1% |
| 1881 | 135.80 million | +0.5% |
| 1882 | 140.75 million | +3.6% |
| 1883 | 146.31 million | +3.9% |
| 1884 | 146.25 million | -0.0% |
| 1885 | 146.35 million | +0.1% |
| 1886 | 149.48 million | +2.1% |
| 1887 | 151.73 million | +1.5% |
| 1888 | 156.77 million | +3.3% |
| 1889 | 156.72 million | -0.0% |
| 1890 | 146.17 million | -6.7% |
| 1891 | 145.49 million | -0.5% |
| 1892 | 142.42 million | -2.1% |
| 1893 | 142.27 million | -0.1% |
| 1894 | 140.67 million | -1.1% |
| 1895 | 142.35 million | +1.2% |
| 1896 | 144.90 million | +1.8% |
| 1897 | 143.72 million | -0.8% |
| 1898 | 143.51 million | -0.1% |
| 1899 | 145.86 million | +1.6% |
| 1900 | 204.79 million | +40.4% |
| 1901 | 229.89 million | +12.3% |
| 1902 | 248.08 million | +7.9% |
| 1903 | 265.78 million | +7.1% |
| 1904 | 286.02 million | +7.6% |
| 1905 | 299.78 million | +4.8% |
| 1906 | 313.73 million | +4.7% |
| 1907 | 331.04 million | +5.5% |
| 1908 | 340.31 million | +2.8% |
| 1909 | 349.14 million | +2.6% |
| 1910 | 366.04 million | +4.8% |
| 1911 | 383.91 million | +4.9% |
| 1912 | 397.48 million | +3.5% |
| 1913 | 417.11 million | +4.9% |
| 1914 | 419.21 million | +0.5% |
| 1915 | 410.16 million | -2.2% |
| 1916 | 438.80 million | +7.0% |
| 1917 | 441.66 million | +0.7% |
| 1918 | 460.68 million | +4.3% |
| 1919 | 452.94 million | -1.7% |
| 1920 | 432.59 million | -4.5% |
| 1921 | 418.60 million | -3.2% |
| 1922 | 416.53 million | -0.5% |
| 1923 | 426.08 million | +2.3% |
| 1924 | 412.46 million | -3.2% |
| 1925 | 406.99 million | -1.3% |
| 1926 | 420.12 million | +3.2% |
| 1927 | 416.26 million | -0.9% |
| 1928 | 416.72 million | +0.1% |
| 1929 | 425.33 million | +2.1% |
| 1930 | 415.13 million | -2.4% |
| 1931 | 397.42 million | -4.3% |
| 1932 | 389.36 million | -2.0% |
| 1933 | 381.26 million | -2.1% |
| 1934 | 395.91 million | +3.8% |
| 1935 | 390.32 million | -1.4% |
| 1936 | 400.34 million | +2.6% |
| 1937 | 402.07 million | +0.4% |
| 1938 | 394.61 million | -1.9% |
| 1939 | 403.72 million | +2.3% |
| 1940 | 394.71 million | -2.2% |
| 1941 | 397.74 million | +0.8% |
| 1942 | 410.41 million | +3.2% |
| 1943 | 408.76 million | -0.4% |
| 1944 | 406.13 million | -0.6% |
| 1945 | 400.71 million | -1.3% |
| 1946 | 408.39 million | +1.9% |
| 1947 | 406.27 million | -0.5% |
| 1948 | 418.58 million | +3.0% |
| 1949 | 402.23 million | -3.9% |
| 1950 | 498.20 million | +23.9% |
| 1951 | 516.67 million | +3.7% |
| 1952 | 541.97 million | +4.9% |
| 1953 | 561.20 million | +3.5% |
| 1954 | 580.64 million | +3.5% |
| 1955 | 598.25 million | +3.0% |
| 1956 | 615.72 million | +2.9% |
| 1957 | 641.17 million | +4.1% |
| 1958 | 637.65 million | -0.5% |
| 1959 | 654.73 million | +2.7% |
| 1960 | 629.85 million | -3.8% |
| 1961 | 599.87 million | -4.8% |
| 1962 | 572.73 million | -4.5% |
| 1963 | 571.89 million | -0.1% |
| 1964 | 599.34 million | +4.8% |
| 1965 | 616.87 million | +2.9% |
| 1966 | 569.00 million | -7.8% |
| 1967 | 594.03 million | +4.4% |
| 1968 | 570.08 million | -4.0% |
| 1969 | 609.13 million | +6.9% |
| 1970 | 615.30 million | +1.0% |
| 1971 | 636.82 million | +3.5% |
| 1972 | 625.98 million | -1.7% |
| 1973 | 623.77 million | -0.4% |
| 1974 | 644.11 million | +3.3% |
| 1975 | 642.54 million | -0.2% |
| 1976 | 666.84 million | +3.8% |
| 1977 | 665.99 million | -0.1% |
| 1978 | 664.01 million | -0.3% |
| 1979 | 703.64 million | +6.0% |
| 1980 | 710.33 million | +1.0% |
| 1981 | 690.36 million | -2.8% |
| 1982 | 661.83 million | -4.1% |
| 1983 | 639.99 million | -3.3% |
| 1984 | 695.21 million | +8.6% |
| 1985 | 663.59 million | -4.5% |
| 1986 | 675.06 million | +1.7% |
| 1987 | 691.72 million | +2.5% |
| 1988 | 704.86 million | +1.9% |
| 1989 | 702.65 million | -0.3% |
| 1990 | 699.37 million | -0.5% |
| 1991 | 674.76 million | -3.5% |
| 1992 | 701.05 million | +3.9% |
| 1993 | 696.43 million | -0.7% |
| 1994 | 718.15 million | +3.1% |
| 1995 | 734.63 million | +2.3% |
| 1996 | 772.47 million | +5.2% |
| 1997 | 755.81 million | -2.2% |
| 1998 | 759.67 million | +0.5% |
| 1999 | 780.21 million | +2.7% |
| 2000 | 833.32 million | +6.8% |
| 2001 | 832.72 million | -0.1% |
| 2002 | 805.99 million | -3.2% |
| 2003 | 812.96 million | +0.9% |
| 2004 | 810.99 million | -0.2% |
| 2005 | 808.71 million | -0.3% |
| 2006 | 768.03 million | -5.0% |
| 2007 | 759.13 million | -1.2% |
| 2008 | 735.37 million | -3.1% |
| 2009 | 653.95 million | -11.1% |
| 2010 | 643.37 million | -1.6% |
| 2011 | 695.60 million | +8.1% |
| 2012 | 700.00 million | +0.6% |
| 2013 | 706.76 million | +1.0% |
| 2014 | 720.20 million | +1.9% |
| 2015 | 725.97 million | +0.8% |
| 2016 | 693.38 million | -4.5% |
| 2017 | 729.88 million | +5.3% |
| 2018 | 716.29 million | -1.9% |
| 2019 | 698.97 million | -2.4% |
| 2020 | 646.33 million | -7.5% |
| 2021 | 672.72 million | +4.1% |
| 2022 | 661.64 million | -1.6% |
| 2023 | 666.91 million | +0.8% |
| 2024 | 645.29 million | -3.2% |
Canada compared with similar countries
- Canada's 645.29 million is above the median for high income countries, which is 36.71 million, 17.6× the median. (62 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Annual co2 including land use in Canada changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900 | +40.4% | 145.86 million | 204.79 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 85.97 million | 70.27 million | 98.66 million | 10 |
| 1860s | 121.82 million | 108.69 million | 133.47 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 124.85 million | 121.15 million | 128.62 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 146.53 million | 135.13 million | 156.77 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 143.74 million | 140.67 million | 146.17 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 286.85 million | 204.79 million | 349.14 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 418.80 million | 366.04 million | 460.68 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 419.17 million | 406.99 million | 432.59 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 397.01 million | 381.26 million | 415.13 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 405.39 million | 394.71 million | 418.58 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 584.62 million | 498.20 million | 654.73 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 593.28 million | 569.00 million | 629.85 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 648.90 million | 615.30 million | 703.64 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 683.56 million | 639.99 million | 710.33 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 729.25 million | 674.76 million | 780.21 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 782.12 million | 653.95 million | 833.32 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 703.04 million | 643.37 million | 729.88 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 658.58 million | 645.29 million | 672.72 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Canada
- 8 Iran 816.89 million compare
- 9 Saudi Arabia 692.61 million compare
- 10 Democratic Republic of Congo 654.10 million compare
- 12 South Korea 580.06 million compare
- 13 Germany 567.34 million compare
- 14 Turkey 503.51 million compare
More climate change data for Canada
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 2.27 billion kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 44,359 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 9,631 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 34,728 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 36.34 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 1,240 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 17,229 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 16,823 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 406.39 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 63.48 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is annual co2 including land use in Canada?
- Annual co2 including land use in Canada was 645.29 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest annual co2 including land use recorded in Canada?
- The highest recorded value was 833.32 million in 2000.
- What is the lowest annual co2 including land use recorded in Canada?
- The lowest recorded value was 70.27 million in 1850.
- How does Canada rank for annual co2 including land use?
- Canada ranks 11th out of 194 countries with data for 2024.
- Is annual co2 including land use rising or falling in Canada?
- Over the last ten years it is down 10.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Canada data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Annual co2 including land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).