Annual co2 including land use in Norway
Norway: Annual co2 including land use was 44.93 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
44.93 million
Change on year
down 3.7%
World rank
73rd
of 194 countries
All-time high
50.78 million
in 2015
All-time low
-4.85 million
in 1959
Years of data
175
1850–2024
Annual co2 including land use in Norway, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
Norway recorded 44.93 million for annual co2 including land use in 2024.
That represents a change of down 3.7% on the previous year and down 9.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, annual co2 including land use in Norway peaked at 50.78 million in 2015 and was at its lowest, -4.85 million, in 1959.
That places Norway 73rd out of 194 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Annual co2 including land use in Norway, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 13.92 million | — |
| 1851 | 13.89 million | -0.3% |
| 1852 | 13.89 million | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 13.91 million | +0.2% |
| 1854 | 13.98 million | +0.5% |
| 1855 | 14.01 million | +0.2% |
| 1856 | 14.04 million | +0.2% |
| 1857 | 14.11 million | +0.5% |
| 1858 | 14.00 million | -0.8% |
| 1859 | 14.11 million | +0.8% |
| 1860 | 13.59 million | -3.7% |
| 1861 | 13.50 million | -0.6% |
| 1862 | 13.38 million | -0.9% |
| 1863 | 13.32 million | -0.4% |
| 1864 | 13.42 million | +0.7% |
| 1865 | 13.37 million | -0.4% |
| 1866 | 13.42 million | +0.4% |
| 1867 | 13.51 million | +0.7% |
| 1868 | 13.51 million | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 13.39 million | -0.9% |
| 1870 | 13.28 million | -0.8% |
| 1871 | 13.23 million | -0.4% |
| 1872 | 13.27 million | +0.3% |
| 1873 | 13.31 million | +0.3% |
| 1874 | 13.47 million | +1.2% |
| 1875 | 13.68 million | +1.6% |
| 1876 | 13.57 million | -0.8% |
| 1877 | 13.89 million | +2.4% |
| 1878 | 13.71 million | -1.3% |
| 1879 | 13.77 million | +0.4% |
| 1880 | 13.84 million | +0.6% |
| 1881 | 13.84 million | -0.0% |
| 1882 | 13.94 million | +0.7% |
| 1883 | 14.01 million | +0.5% |
| 1884 | 13.98 million | -0.2% |
| 1885 | 14.16 million | +1.3% |
| 1886 | 14.03 million | -0.9% |
| 1887 | 13.87 million | -1.2% |
| 1888 | 14.04 million | +1.2% |
| 1889 | 14.21 million | +1.2% |
| 1890 | 14.61 million | +2.8% |
| 1891 | 14.99 million | +2.5% |
| 1892 | 15.04 million | +0.4% |
| 1893 | 15.11 million | +0.4% |
| 1894 | 15.53 million | +2.8% |
| 1895 | 15.73 million | +1.3% |
| 1896 | 15.84 million | +0.7% |
| 1897 | 16.17 million | +2.0% |
| 1898 | 16.19 million | +0.1% |
| 1899 | 16.95 million | +4.7% |
| 1900 | 16.31 million | -3.8% |
| 1901 | 15.91 million | -2.4% |
| 1902 | 16.12 million | +1.3% |
| 1903 | 16.06 million | -0.3% |
| 1904 | 15.93 million | -0.9% |
| 1905 | 15.82 million | -0.6% |
| 1906 | 15.82 million | -0.0% |
| 1907 | 16.29 million | +3.0% |
| 1908 | 17.19 million | +5.5% |
| 1909 | 17.10 million | -0.5% |
| 1910 | 17.67 million | +3.3% |
| 1911 | 17.89 million | +1.3% |
| 1912 | 18.69 million | +4.4% |
| 1913 | 18.68 million | -0.0% |
| 1914 | 19.44 million | +4.0% |
| 1915 | 20.17 million | +3.8% |
| 1916 | 19.62 million | -2.7% |
| 1917 | 15.20 million | -22.5% |
| 1918 | 16.17 million | +6.3% |
| 1919 | 17.03 million | +5.4% |
| 1920 | 16.21 million | -4.8% |
| 1921 | 13.99 million | -13.7% |
| 1922 | 16.88 million | +20.7% |
| 1923 | 16.95 million | +0.4% |
| 1924 | 17.67 million | +4.3% |
| 1925 | 17.33 million | -1.9% |
| 1926 | 15.86 million | -8.5% |
| 1927 | 17.94 million | +13.1% |
| 1928 | 17.55 million | -2.2% |
| 1929 | 18.36 million | +4.6% |
| 1930 | 17.32 million | -5.7% |
| 1931 | 16.38 million | -5.4% |
| 1932 | 16.69 million | +1.9% |
| 1933 | 16.98 million | +1.7% |
| 1934 | 16.95 million | -0.1% |
| 1935 | 17.04 million | +0.5% |
| 1936 | 17.47 million | +2.6% |
| 1937 | 18.53 million | +6.1% |
| 1938 | 16.98 million | -8.4% |
| 1939 | 18.84 million | +11.0% |
| 1940 | 12.47 million | -33.8% |
| 1941 | 10.43 million | -16.4% |
| 1942 | 9.89 million | -5.2% |
| 1943 | 10.42 million | +5.4% |
| 1944 | 9.91 million | -4.9% |
| 1945 | 8.88 million | -10.3% |
| 1946 | 11.72 million | +32.0% |
| 1947 | 15.09 million | +28.8% |
| 1948 | 15.22 million | +0.9% |
| 1949 | 14.39 million | -5.4% |
| 1950 | 12.10 million | -15.9% |
| 1951 | 12.70 million | +4.9% |
| 1952 | 12.29 million | -3.2% |
| 1953 | 11.72 million | -4.6% |
| 1954 | 10.81 million | -7.8% |
| 1955 | 11.26 million | +4.2% |
| 1956 | 10.41 million | -7.6% |
| 1957 | 8.11 million | -22.0% |
| 1958 | 5.28 million | -35.0% |
| 1959 | -4.85 million | -191.9% |
| 1960 | 8.37 million | -272.7% |
| 1961 | 1.47 million | -82.5% |
| 1962 | 1.61 million | +9.7% |
| 1963 | 2.78 million | +72.7% |
| 1964 | 4.53 million | +62.8% |
| 1965 | 5.42 million | +19.6% |
| 1966 | 8.83 million | +63.0% |
| 1967 | 9.08 million | +2.9% |
| 1968 | 11.17 million | +23.0% |
| 1969 | 12.45 million | +11.4% |
| 1970 | 18.57 million | +49.1% |
| 1971 | 18.24 million | -1.8% |
| 1972 | 20.89 million | +14.5% |
| 1973 | 22.51 million | +7.8% |
| 1974 | 20.35 million | -9.6% |
| 1975 | 23.99 million | +17.9% |
| 1976 | 27.32 million | +13.9% |
| 1977 | 27.60 million | +1.0% |
| 1978 | 29.46 million | +6.8% |
| 1979 | 30.20 million | +2.5% |
| 1980 | 27.94 million | -7.5% |
| 1981 | 28.80 million | +3.1% |
| 1982 | 28.30 million | -1.7% |
| 1983 | 29.91 million | +5.7% |
| 1984 | 32.10 million | +7.3% |
| 1985 | 31.36 million | -2.3% |
| 1986 | 33.90 million | +8.1% |
| 1987 | 32.97 million | -2.7% |
| 1988 | 36.30 million | +10.1% |
| 1989 | 34.61 million | -4.6% |
| 1990 | 37.69 million | +8.9% |
| 1991 | 35.23 million | -6.5% |
| 1992 | 36.60 million | +3.9% |
| 1993 | 39.20 million | +7.1% |
| 1994 | 45.55 million | +16.2% |
| 1995 | 43.91 million | -3.6% |
| 1996 | 43.92 million | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 44.18 million | +0.6% |
| 1998 | 43.87 million | -0.7% |
| 1999 | 44.98 million | +2.6% |
| 2000 | 44.43 million | -1.2% |
| 2001 | 45.77 million | +3.0% |
| 2002 | 44.71 million | -2.3% |
| 2003 | 46.35 million | +3.7% |
| 2004 | 46.78 million | +0.9% |
| 2005 | 46.35 million | -0.9% |
| 2006 | 46.97 million | +1.3% |
| 2007 | 48.96 million | +4.2% |
| 2008 | 48.23 million | -1.5% |
| 2009 | 46.53 million | -3.5% |
| 2010 | 49.53 million | +6.4% |
| 2011 | 48.56 million | -2.0% |
| 2012 | 48.23 million | -0.7% |
| 2013 | 49.08 million | +1.8% |
| 2014 | 49.87 million | +1.6% |
| 2015 | 50.78 million | +1.8% |
| 2016 | 50.32 million | -0.9% |
| 2017 | 50.29 million | -0.1% |
| 2018 | 50.61 million | +0.6% |
| 2019 | 49.44 million | -2.3% |
| 2020 | 47.84 million | -3.2% |
| 2021 | 48.25 million | +0.8% |
| 2022 | 48.49 million | +0.5% |
| 2023 | 46.66 million | -3.8% |
| 2024 | 44.93 million | -3.7% |
Norway compared with similar countries
- Norway's 44.93 million is above the median for high income countries, which is 36.71 million, 1.2× the median. (62 countries reporting)
- Norway's 44.93 million is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 32.46 million, 1.4× the median. (50 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Annual co2 including land use in Norway changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1960 | +272.7% | -4.85 million | 8.37 million |
| 1959 | -191.9% | 5.28 million | -4.85 million |
| 1961 | -82.5% | 8.37 million | 1.47 million |
| 1963 | +72.7% | 1.61 million | 2.78 million |
| 1966 | +63.0% | 5.42 million | 8.83 million |
| 1964 | +62.8% | 2.78 million | 4.53 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 13.99 million | 13.89 million | 14.11 million | 10 |
| 1860s | 13.44 million | 13.32 million | 13.59 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 13.52 million | 13.23 million | 13.89 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 13.99 million | 13.84 million | 14.21 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 15.62 million | 14.61 million | 16.95 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 16.26 million | 15.82 million | 17.19 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 18.06 million | 15.20 million | 20.17 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 16.87 million | 13.99 million | 18.36 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 17.32 million | 16.38 million | 18.84 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 11.84 million | 8.88 million | 15.22 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 8.98 million | -4.85 million | 12.70 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 6.57 million | 1.47 million | 12.45 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 23.91 million | 18.24 million | 30.20 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 31.62 million | 27.94 million | 36.30 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 41.51 million | 35.23 million | 45.55 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 46.51 million | 44.43 million | 48.96 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 49.67 million | 48.23 million | 50.78 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 47.23 million | 44.93 million | 48.49 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Norway
More climate change data for Norway
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 147.21 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 4,074 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 927.05 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 3,147 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 3.5 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 112.4 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 904.43 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 902.03 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 2.4 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 3.4 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is annual co2 including land use in Norway?
- Annual co2 including land use in Norway was 44.93 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest annual co2 including land use recorded in Norway?
- The highest recorded value was 50.78 million in 2015.
- What is the lowest annual co2 including land use recorded in Norway?
- The lowest recorded value was -4.85 million in 1959.
- How does Norway rank for annual co2 including land use?
- Norway ranks 73rd out of 194 countries with data for 2024.
- Is annual co2 including land use rising or falling in Norway?
- Over the last ten years it is down 9.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Norway data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Annual co2 including land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).