Annual co2 including land use in Sweden
Sweden: Annual co2 including land use was 46.09 million in 2024. ▲ Rising
Latest (2024)
46.09 million
Change on year
up 0.6%
World rank
72nd
of 194 countries
All-time high
69.85 million
in 1976
All-time low
14.70 million
in 1959
Years of data
175
1850–2024
Annual co2 including land use in Sweden, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
Sweden recorded 46.09 million for annual co2 including land use in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.6% on the previous year and down 3.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, annual co2 including land use in Sweden peaked at 69.85 million in 1976 and was at its lowest, 14.70 million, in 1959.
That places Sweden 72nd out of 194 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 175 years of available data.
Annual co2 including land use in Sweden, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 26.51 million | — |
| 1851 | 26.66 million | +0.5% |
| 1852 | 27.06 million | +1.5% |
| 1853 | 27.22 million | +0.6% |
| 1854 | 27.67 million | +1.7% |
| 1855 | 27.93 million | +0.9% |
| 1856 | 28.19 million | +0.9% |
| 1857 | 28.71 million | +1.9% |
| 1858 | 28.87 million | +0.5% |
| 1859 | 29.55 million | +2.4% |
| 1860 | 29.48 million | -0.2% |
| 1861 | 29.81 million | +1.1% |
| 1862 | 30.45 million | +2.1% |
| 1863 | 30.83 million | +1.3% |
| 1864 | 31.23 million | +1.3% |
| 1865 | 31.42 million | +0.6% |
| 1866 | 31.97 million | +1.8% |
| 1867 | 32.32 million | +1.1% |
| 1868 | 32.77 million | +1.4% |
| 1869 | 32.86 million | +0.3% |
| 1870 | 33.51 million | +2.0% |
| 1871 | 33.63 million | +0.4% |
| 1872 | 34.17 million | +1.6% |
| 1873 | 34.69 million | +1.5% |
| 1874 | 34.95 million | +0.7% |
| 1875 | 35.74 million | +2.3% |
| 1876 | 36.48 million | +2.1% |
| 1877 | 36.77 million | +0.8% |
| 1878 | 36.51 million | -0.7% |
| 1879 | 36.75 million | +0.7% |
| 1880 | 35.28 million | -4.0% |
| 1881 | 34.71 million | -1.6% |
| 1882 | 35.07 million | +1.0% |
| 1883 | 35.33 million | +0.8% |
| 1884 | 35.53 million | +0.6% |
| 1885 | 35.71 million | +0.5% |
| 1886 | 35.29 million | -1.2% |
| 1887 | 35.08 million | -0.6% |
| 1888 | 35.29 million | +0.6% |
| 1889 | 36.11 million | +2.3% |
| 1890 | 36.85 million | +2.1% |
| 1891 | 37.43 million | +1.6% |
| 1892 | 37.85 million | +1.1% |
| 1893 | 37.36 million | -1.3% |
| 1894 | 37.91 million | +1.5% |
| 1895 | 38.26 million | +0.9% |
| 1896 | 38.47 million | +0.5% |
| 1897 | 38.97 million | +1.3% |
| 1898 | 39.70 million | +1.9% |
| 1899 | 41.64 million | +4.9% |
| 1900 | 41.90 million | +0.6% |
| 1901 | 41.54 million | -0.9% |
| 1902 | 42.37 million | +2.0% |
| 1903 | 43.41 million | +2.5% |
| 1904 | 44.09 million | +1.6% |
| 1905 | 44.49 million | +0.9% |
| 1906 | 45.87 million | +3.1% |
| 1907 | 47.29 million | +3.1% |
| 1908 | 48.46 million | +2.5% |
| 1909 | 47.57 million | -1.9% |
| 1910 | 46.83 million | -1.6% |
| 1911 | 46.14 million | -1.5% |
| 1912 | 47.19 million | +2.3% |
| 1913 | 48.93 million | +3.7% |
| 1914 | 47.95 million | -2.0% |
| 1915 | 47.67 million | -0.6% |
| 1916 | 48.34 million | +1.4% |
| 1917 | 39.01 million | -19.3% |
| 1918 | 39.94 million | +2.4% |
| 1919 | 39.30 million | -1.6% |
| 1920 | 42.15 million | +7.3% |
| 1921 | 37.20 million | -11.7% |
| 1922 | 41.19 million | +10.7% |
| 1923 | 42.96 million | +4.3% |
| 1924 | 45.19 million | +5.2% |
| 1925 | 43.43 million | -3.9% |
| 1926 | 42.62 million | -1.9% |
| 1927 | 47.30 million | +11.0% |
| 1928 | 45.45 million | -3.9% |
| 1929 | 48.29 million | +6.2% |
| 1930 | 46.80 million | -3.1% |
| 1931 | 45.93 million | -1.8% |
| 1932 | 45.01 million | -2.0% |
| 1933 | 44.66 million | -0.8% |
| 1934 | 46.32 million | +3.7% |
| 1935 | 46.49 million | +0.4% |
| 1936 | 47.86 million | +3.0% |
| 1937 | 50.93 million | +6.4% |
| 1938 | 47.43 million | -6.9% |
| 1939 | 49.50 million | +4.4% |
| 1940 | 38.50 million | -22.2% |
| 1941 | 34.32 million | -10.9% |
| 1942 | 31.61 million | -7.9% |
| 1943 | 34.12 million | +7.9% |
| 1944 | 34.20 million | +0.3% |
| 1945 | 27.21 million | -20.4% |
| 1946 | 40.30 million | +48.1% |
| 1947 | 48.17 million | +19.5% |
| 1948 | 53.65 million | +11.4% |
| 1949 | 49.04 million | -8.6% |
| 1950 | 49.89 million | +1.7% |
| 1951 | 52.90 million | +6.0% |
| 1952 | 51.42 million | -2.8% |
| 1953 | 46.33 million | -9.9% |
| 1954 | 44.43 million | -4.1% |
| 1955 | 45.05 million | +1.4% |
| 1956 | 44.54 million | -1.1% |
| 1957 | 34.81 million | -21.8% |
| 1958 | 31.60 million | -9.2% |
| 1959 | 14.70 million | -53.5% |
| 1960 | 25.66 million | +74.6% |
| 1961 | 21.35 million | -16.8% |
| 1962 | 20.65 million | -3.3% |
| 1963 | 24.37 million | +18.0% |
| 1964 | 28.95 million | +18.8% |
| 1965 | 31.41 million | +8.5% |
| 1966 | 42.29 million | +34.6% |
| 1967 | 39.26 million | -7.2% |
| 1968 | 50.13 million | +27.7% |
| 1969 | 59.98 million | +19.6% |
| 1970 | 67.28 million | +12.2% |
| 1971 | 60.90 million | -9.5% |
| 1972 | 61.55 million | +1.1% |
| 1973 | 66.18 million | +7.5% |
| 1974 | 59.98 million | -9.4% |
| 1975 | 61.97 million | +3.3% |
| 1976 | 69.85 million | +12.7% |
| 1977 | 67.93 million | -2.7% |
| 1978 | 61.77 million | -9.1% |
| 1979 | 68.03 million | +10.1% |
| 1980 | 55.44 million | -18.5% |
| 1981 | 53.47 million | -3.6% |
| 1982 | 46.91 million | -12.3% |
| 1983 | 43.95 million | -6.3% |
| 1984 | 42.97 million | -2.2% |
| 1985 | 48.43 million | +12.7% |
| 1986 | 48.70 million | +0.6% |
| 1987 | 46.88 million | -3.7% |
| 1988 | 45.44 million | -3.1% |
| 1989 | 44.63 million | -1.8% |
| 1990 | 46.05 million | +3.2% |
| 1991 | 46.75 million | +1.5% |
| 1992 | 48.24 million | +3.2% |
| 1993 | 48.84 million | +1.2% |
| 1994 | 51.56 million | +5.6% |
| 1995 | 54.86 million | +6.4% |
| 1996 | 57.02 million | +3.9% |
| 1997 | 52.93 million | -7.2% |
| 1998 | 54.33 million | +2.6% |
| 1999 | 48.48 million | -10.8% |
| 2000 | 53.26 million | +9.9% |
| 2001 | 54.38 million | +2.1% |
| 2002 | 54.33 million | -0.1% |
| 2003 | 56.59 million | +4.2% |
| 2004 | 60.55 million | +7.0% |
| 2005 | 58.72 million | -3.0% |
| 2006 | 56.33 million | -4.1% |
| 2007 | 56.39 million | +0.1% |
| 2008 | 54.69 million | -3.0% |
| 2009 | 51.32 million | -6.1% |
| 2010 | 56.87 million | +10.8% |
| 2011 | 52.62 million | -7.5% |
| 2012 | 50.36 million | -4.3% |
| 2013 | 48.82 million | -3.1% |
| 2014 | 47.70 million | -2.3% |
| 2015 | 48.33 million | +1.3% |
| 2016 | 48.98 million | +1.4% |
| 2017 | 49.24 million | +0.5% |
| 2018 | 48.90 million | -0.7% |
| 2019 | 48.48 million | -0.9% |
| 2020 | 44.52 million | -8.2% |
| 2021 | 47.19 million | +6.0% |
| 2022 | 45.76 million | -3.0% |
| 2023 | 45.80 million | +0.1% |
| 2024 | 46.09 million | +0.6% |
Sweden compared with similar countries
- Sweden's 46.09 million is above the median for high income countries, which is 36.71 million, 1.3× the median. (62 countries reporting)
- Sweden's 46.09 million is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 32.46 million, 1.4× the median. (50 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Annual co2 including land use in Sweden changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1960 | +74.6% | 14.70 million | 25.66 million |
| 1959 | -53.5% | 31.60 million | 14.70 million |
| 1946 | +48.1% | 27.21 million | 40.30 million |
| 1966 | +34.6% | 31.41 million | 42.29 million |
| 1968 | +27.7% | 39.26 million | 50.13 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 27.84 million | 26.51 million | 29.55 million | 10 |
| 1860s | 31.31 million | 29.48 million | 32.86 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 35.32 million | 33.51 million | 36.77 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 35.34 million | 34.71 million | 36.11 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 38.45 million | 36.85 million | 41.64 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 44.70 million | 41.54 million | 48.46 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 45.13 million | 39.01 million | 48.93 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 43.58 million | 37.20 million | 48.29 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 47.09 million | 44.66 million | 50.93 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 39.11 million | 27.21 million | 53.65 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 41.57 million | 14.70 million | 52.90 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 34.41 million | 20.65 million | 59.98 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 64.55 million | 59.98 million | 69.85 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 47.68 million | 42.97 million | 55.44 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 50.91 million | 46.05 million | 57.02 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 55.66 million | 51.32 million | 60.55 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 50.03 million | 47.70 million | 56.87 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 45.87 million | 44.52 million | 47.19 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Sweden
More climate change data for Sweden
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 160.40 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 4,738 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 983.81 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 3,754 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 3.71 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 134.07 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 1,196 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,185 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 10.86 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 4.47 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is annual co2 including land use in Sweden?
- Annual co2 including land use in Sweden was 46.09 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest annual co2 including land use recorded in Sweden?
- The highest recorded value was 69.85 million in 1976.
- What is the lowest annual co2 including land use recorded in Sweden?
- The lowest recorded value was 14.70 million in 1959.
- How does Sweden rank for annual co2 including land use?
- Sweden ranks 72nd out of 194 countries with data for 2024.
- Is annual co2 including land use rising or falling in Sweden?
- Over the last ten years it is down 3.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Sweden data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Annual co2 including land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).